Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29650012›Full record

ReviewBiomedical engineering online2018

Technologies to monitor the health of loaded skin tissues.

Dan L Bader, Peter R Worsley

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07560683 (Investigation of Skin Barrier Function Using Biosensor Methods in Risky Skin Regions and Developed Pressure Injuries in Intensive Care Patients, and Identification of Influencing Factors), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07560683 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of Skin Barrier Function Using Biosensor Methods in Risky Skin Regions and Developed Pressure Injuries in Intensive Care Patients, and Identification of Influencing Factors: The SKIN-BAR Project

TypeobservationalSponsorKoç UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled156ConditionsPressure Injuries, Skin Failure, Skin Abnormalities, Biophysical Parameters of Skin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. An evaluation of mechanical and biophysical skin parameters at different body locations.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dan L BaderSkin Health Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. D.L.Bader@soton.ac.uk.
Peter R WorsleySkin Health Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. P.R.Worsley@soton.ac.uk.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/M000303/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/N02723X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are many situations where the skin and underlying soft tissues are compromised by mechanical loading in the form or pressure, or pressure in combination with shear. If sustained, this can lead to damage in the tissues particularly adjacent to bony prominences, resulting in chronic wounds. An array of bioengineering technologies have been adopted to assess the integrity of loaded soft tissues. This paper aims to review these approaches for the quantification, simulation and early detection of mechanically-induced skin damage. The review considers different measurements at the interface between the skin and support surface/medical device, involving pressure, shear, friction and the local microclimate. The potential of the techniques to monitor the physiological response of the skin to these external stimuli including biophysical measurement devices and sampling of biofluids are critically analysed. In addition, it includes an analysis of medical imaging technologies and computational modelling to provide a means by which tissue deformation can be quantified and thresholds for tissue damage defined. Bioengineering measurement and imaging technologies have provided an insight into the temporal status of loaded skin. Despite the advances in technology, to date, the translation to clinical tools which are robust and cost effective has been limited. There is a need to adapt existing technologies and simulation platforms to enable patients, carers and clinicians to employ appropriate intervention strategies to minimise soft tissue damage.

Indexed as

Skin Physiological PhenomenaDiagnostic ImagingHumansPressureSkinWeight-Bearing

Identifiers

PMID29650012
PMCPMC5897925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.