ReviewBMC cancer2018
In silico cancer research towards 3R.
Review in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-generation osteosarcoma models for precision medicine.Communications biology · 2026Review
- An insilico analysis: three upregulated microRNAs as potential diagnostic biomarkers of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma (PTC).Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Toward cardiac electrophysiology digital twins with an efficient open source scalable solver on GPU clusters.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) in Genotoxicology: From the Basics to Modern Approaches.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Article
- Study the impact ofCytotechnology · 2025Article
- Repurposing brucine as a chemopreventive agent in mammary gland carcinoma: Regulating lactate transport through MCT-4.Toxicology reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Deciphering molecular pathways driving cancer invasion and metastasis: advances and therapeutic prospects.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Animal models in neuroscience with alternative approaches: Evolutionary, biomedical, and ethical perspectives.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2024Review
- Preclinical Models of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Utility, Limitations, and Challenges.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Robust and consistent biomarker candidates identification by a machine learning approach applied to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma metastasis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Expression analysis and mapping of Viral-Host Protein interactions of Poxviridae suggests a lead candidate molecule targeting Mpox.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- FromFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Article
- Non-synonymous SNPs variants of PRKCG and its association with oncogenes predispose to hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer cell international · 2023Article
- Review
- Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement of Animal Experiments in Anticancer Drug Development: The Contribution of 3D In Vitro Cancer Models in the Drug Efficacy Assessment.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Effect of AddingFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Recurrent-Specific Regulation Network of Prognostic Stemness-Related Signatures in Low-Grade Glioma.Disease markers · 2023Article
- Multi-omics disease module detection with an explainable Greedy Decision Forest.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImproving our understanding of cancer and other complex diseases requires integrating diverse data sets and algorithms. Intertwining in vivo and in vitro data and in silico models are paramount to overcome intrinsic difficulties given by data complexity. Importantly, this approach also helps to uncover underlying molecular mechanisms. Over the years, research has introduced multiple biochemical and computational methods to study the disease, many of which require animal experiments. However, modeling systems and the comparison of cellular processes in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes help to understand specific aspects of uncontrolled cell growth, eventually leading to improved planning of future experiments. According to the principles for humane techniques milestones in alternative animal testing involve in vitro methods such as cell-based models and microfluidic chips, as well as clinical tests of microdosing and imaging. Up-to-date, the range of alternative methods has expanded towards computational approaches, based on the use of information from past in vitro and in vivo experiments. In fact, in silico techniques are often underrated but can be vital to understanding fundamental processes in cancer. They can rival accuracy of biological assays, and they can provide essential focus and direction to reduce experimental cost. MAIN BODY: We give an overview on in vivo, in vitro and in silico methods used in cancer research. Common models as cell-lines, xenografts, or genetically modified rodents reflect relevant pathological processes to a different degree, but can not replicate the full spectrum of human disease. There is an increasing importance of computational biology, advancing from the task of assisting biological analysis with network biology approaches as the basis for understanding a cell's functional organization up to model building for predictive systems.
conclusionUnderlining and extending the in silico approach with respect to the 3Rs for replacement, reduction and refinement will lead cancer research towards efficient and effective precision medicine. Therefore, we suggest refined translational models and testing methods based on integrative analyses and the incorporation of computational biology within cancer research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.