Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29649352›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2018

Interstitial Lung Diseases in the U.S. Mining Industry: Using MSHA Data to Examine Trends and the Prevention Effects of Compliance with Health Regulations, 1996-2015.

Patrick L Yorio, A Scott Laney, Cara N Halldin, David J Blackley, Susan M Moore, Kerri Wizner, Lewis J Radonovich, Lee A Greenawald

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Uncovering the Factors Behind Rising Pneumoconiosis Rates: Central Appalachian Underground Coal Miners as a Case Study.New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Current Review of Pneumoconiosis Among US Coal Miners.Current environmental health reports · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick L YorioNational Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
A Scott LaneyRespiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Cara N HalldinRespiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA.
David J BlackleyRespiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Susan M MooreNational Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kerri WiznerNational Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lewis J RadonovichNational Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lee A GreenawaldNational Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · US

Funding

CDC HHSIntramural CDC HHS CC999999NIOSH CDC HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the recent increase in dust-induced lung disease among U.S. coal miners and the respiratory hazards encountered across the U.S. mining industry, it is important to enhance an understanding of lung disease trends and the organizational contexts that precede these events. In addition to exploring overall trends reported to the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), the current study uses MSHA's enforcement database to examine whether or not compliance with health regulations resulted in fewer mine-level counts of these diseases over time. The findings suggest that interstitial lung diseases were more prevalent in coal mines compared to other mining commodities, in Appalachian coal mines compared to the rest of the United States, and in underground compared to surface coal mines. Mines that followed a relevant subset of MSHA's health regulations were less likely to report a lung disease over time. The findings are discussed from a lung disease prevention strategy perspective.

Indexed as

DustMiningAppalachian RegionGeographyHumansLung Diseases, InterstitialModels, StatisticalOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposurePrevalenceRegression AnalysisRisk AssessmentSafety ManagementUnited StatesDustInterstitial lung diseasesU.S. mining industry

Identifiers

PMID29649352
PMCPMC6238148
OpenAlexW2799919212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.