Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29649302›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Identifying tumor in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms from Ki67 images using transfer learning.

Muhammad Khalid Khan Niazi, Thomas Erol Tavolara, Vidya Arole, Douglas J Hartman, Liron Pantanowitz, Metin N Gurcan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad Khalid Khan NiaziCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1278-7512
Thomas Erol TavolaraCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, United States of America.
Vidya AroleDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
Douglas J HartmanDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Liron PantanowitzDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Metin N GurcanCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, United States of America.
Wake Forest University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Pathology Image Informatics Platform for visualization, analysis and managementU24CA199374 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GURCAN, METIN NAFI, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Computer-based assessment of tumor microenvironment (TME) in Follicular LymphomaR01CA134451 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GURCAN, METIN NAFI, LOZANSKI, GERARD · 2009 to 2017
$2.3M
Task-Specific Compression for Biomedical Big DataU01CA198945 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BILGIN, ALI · 2015 to 2017
$1.6M
Genetic-based susceptibility to pulmonary tuberculosisR21AI115038 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI BEAMER, GILLIAN L · 2015 to 2016
$481k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134451NCI NIH HHS U01 CA198945NCI NIH HHS U24 CA199374NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI115038NIH HHS R01CA134451NIH HHS R21 AI115038NIH HHS U01 CA19894NIH HHS U24CA199374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) has clear guidelines regarding the use of Ki67 index in defining the proliferative rate and assigning grade for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET). WHO mandates the quantification of Ki67 index by counting at least 500 positive tumor cells in a hotspot. Unfortunately, Ki67 antibody may stain both tumor and non-tumor cells as positive depending on the phase of the cell cycle. Likewise, the counter stain labels both tumor and non-tumor as negative. This non-specific nature of Ki67 stain and counter stain therefore hinders the exact quantification of Ki67 index. To address this problem, we present a deep learning method to automatically differentiate between NET and non-tumor regions based on images of Ki67 stained biopsies. Transfer learning was employed to recognize and apply relevant knowledge from previous learning experiences to differentiate between tumor and non-tumor regions. Transfer learning exploits a rich set of features previously used to successfully categorize non-pathology data into 1,000 classes. The method was trained and validated on a set of whole-slide images including 33 NETs subject to Ki67 immunohistochemical staining using a leave-one-out cross-validation. When applied to 30 high power fields (HPF) and assessed against a gold standard (evaluation by two expert pathologists), the method resulted in a high sensitivity of 97.8% and specificity of 88.8%. The deep learning method developed has the potential to reduce pathologists' workload by directly identifying tumor boundaries on images of Ki67 stained slides. Moreover, it has the potential to replace sophisticated and expensive imaging methods which are recently developed for identification of tumor boundaries in images of Ki67-stained NETs.

Indexed as

Machine LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKi-67 AntigenMolecular ImagingNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsKi-67 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID29649302
PMCPMC5896941
OpenAlexW2796854304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.