ArticlePLoS genetics2018
Innovation in an E. coli evolution experiment is contingent on maintaining adaptive potential until competition subsides.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- A bacterial toxin-antitoxin system as a native defence element against RNA phages.Biology letters · 2025Article
- Self-authenticating genomic materials in Escherichia coli via advanced genome signatures.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Evolutionary poker lacks a full deck when modelling the LTEE CitThe Journal of physiology · 2025Article
- Experimental evolution reveals evolutionary bias and its causes.BMC ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Escherichia coli adaptation under prolonged resource exhaustion is characterized by extreme parallelism and frequent historical contingency.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Promoter recruitment drives the emergence of proto-genes in a long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Evolution of a cross-feeding interaction following a key innovation in a long-term evolution experiment withMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2023Article
- Extreme Sensitivity of Fitness to Environmental Conditions: Lessons from #1BigBatch.Journal of molecular evolution · 2023Article
- Minireview: Engineering evolution to reconfigure phenotypic traits in microbes for biotechnological applications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Evolutionary action of mutations reveals antimicrobial resistance genes in Escherichia coli.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Loss-of-heterozygosity facilitates a fitness valley crossing in experimentally evolved multicellular yeast.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- The cost of evolved constitutiveEcology and evolution · 2021Article
- The landscape of innovation in bacteria, battleships, and beyond.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Historical Contingency Causes Divergence in Adaptive Expression of the lac Operon.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Dynamics of bacterial adaptation.Biochemical Society transactions · 2021Review
- Divergent Evolution of Mutation Rates and Biases in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Genomic and phenotypic evolution ofeLife · 2020Article
- The emergence of adaptive laboratory evolution as an efficient tool for biological discovery and industrial biotechnology.Metabolic engineering · 2019Review
- Historical contingency in the evolution of antibiotic resistance after decades of relaxed selection.PLoS biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Key innovations are disruptive evolutionary events that enable a species to escape constraints and rapidly diversify. After 15 years of the Lenski long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli, cells in one of the twelve populations evolved the ability to utilize citrate, an abundant but previously untapped carbon source in the environment. Descendants of these cells became dominant in the population and subsequently diversified as a consequence of invading this vacant niche. Mutations responsible for the appearance of rudimentary citrate utilization and for refining this ability have been characterized. However, the complete nature of the genetic and/or ecological events that set the stage for this key innovation is unknown. In particular, it is unclear why it took so long for citrate utilization to evolve and why it still has evolved in only one of the twelve E. coli populations after 30 years of the Lenski experiment. In this study, we recapitulated the initial mutation needed to evolve citrate utilization in strains isolated from throughout the first 31,500 generations of the history of this population. We found that there was already a slight fitness benefit for this mutation in the original ancestor of the evolution experiment and in other early isolates. However, evolution of citrate utilization was blocked at this point due to competition with other mutations that improved fitness in the original niche. Subsequently, an anti-potentiated genetic background evolved in which it was deleterious to evolve rudimentary citrate utilization. Only later, after further mutations accumulated that restored the benefit of this first-step mutation and the overall rate of adaptation in the population slowed, was citrate utilization likely to evolve. Thus, intense competition and the types of mutations that it favors can lead to short-sighted evolutionary trajectories that hide a stepping stone needed to access a key innovation from many future generations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.