Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29649212›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

Principles that govern competition or co-existence in Rho-GTPase driven polarization.

Jian-Geng Chiou, Samuel A Ramirez, Timothy C Elston, Thomas P Witelski, David G Schaeffer, Daniel J Lew

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Allocation of resources among multiple daughter cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patterning of the cell cortex by Rho GTPases.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Microtubule nucleation complex behavior is critical for cortical array homogeneityProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Orientation of Cell Polarity by Chemical Gradients.Annual review of biophysics · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jian-Geng ChiouDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3246-5841
Samuel A RamirezDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Timothy C ElstonDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4601-2117
Thomas P WitelskiDepartment of Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0789-9859
David G SchaefferDepartment of Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Daniel J LewDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Studies on cell polarity, chemotropism, and cell cycle controlR35GM122488 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DANIEL J LEW · 2017 to 2026
$6.9M
POLARITY ESTABLISHMENT IN YEASTR01GM062300 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LEW, DANIEL J · 2001 to 2016
$5.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062300NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rho-GTPases are master regulators of polarity establishment and cell morphology. Positive feedback enables concentration of Rho-GTPases into clusters at the cell cortex, from where they regulate the cytoskeleton. Different cell types reproducibly generate either one (e.g. the front of a migrating cell) or several clusters (e.g. the multiple dendrites of a neuron), but the mechanistic basis for unipolar or multipolar outcomes is unclear. The design principles of Rho-GTPase circuits are captured by two-component reaction-diffusion models based on conserved aspects of Rho-GTPase biochemistry. Some such models display rapid winner-takes-all competition between clusters, yielding a unipolar outcome. Other models allow prolonged co-existence of clusters. We investigate the behavior of a simple class of models and show that while the timescale of competition varies enormously depending on model parameters, a single factor explains a large majority of this variation. The dominant factor concerns the degree to which the maximal active GTPase concentration in a cluster approaches a "saturation point" determined by model parameters. We suggest that both saturation and the effect of saturation on competition reflect fundamental properties of the Rho-GTPase polarity machinery, regardless of the specific feedback mechanism, which predict whether the system will generate unipolar or multipolar outcomes.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBinding, CompetitiveCell PolarityComputational BiologyComputer SimulationCytoplasmCytoskeletonKineticsProtein Aggregatesrho GTP-Binding ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsProtein Aggregatesrho GTP-Binding ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29649212
PMCPMC5916526
OpenAlexW2951495812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.