ArticlePLoS computational biology2018
Ten simple rules for responsible referencing.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review of guides and advice for scholarly citing in health research.Research integrity and peer review · 2026Review
- Building better citation practices in public health research: Practical considerations for student researchers, from source discovery to crafting and positioning claims.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Three maxims for countering sex essentialism in scientific research.Biology of sex differences · 2025Review
- Citation Ethics: An Exploratory Survey of Norms and Behaviors.Journal of academic ethics · 2025Article
- Rethinking the Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Course.Biomedical engineering education · 2024Article
- A simulation-based analysis of the impact of rhetorical citations in science.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Ten simple rules for designing and conducting undergraduate replication projects.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Microbiota Modulation in Alzheimer's Disease: A Review of Preclinical Studies.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2023Review
- On Citing Dobzhansky about the Significance of Evolution to Biology.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Multi-attribute temporal descriptive methods in sensory analysis applied in food science: Protocol for a scoping review.PloS one · 2022Article
- Dilution effects in disease ecology.Ecology letters · 2021Review
- The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists.Nature neuroscience · 2020Article
- The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Citation.International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2020Review
- Article
- The art of referencing: Well begun is half done!Journal of postgraduate medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.