Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29649180›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Establishing a Split Luciferase Assay for Proteinkinase G (PKG) Interaction Studies.

Andrea Schramm, Philip Mueller-Thuemen, Timo Littmann, Manuela Harloff, Takeaki Ozawa, Jens Schlossmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea SchrammDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany. Andrea.Schramm@ur.de.
Philip Mueller-ThuemenDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany. philip.mueller-thuemen@bsse.ethz.ch.
Timo LittmannDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry II, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany. Timo.Littmann@ur.de.
Manuela HarloffDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany. Manuela.Harloff@ur.de.
Takeaki OzawaDepartment of chemistry, School of Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. ozawa@chem.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Jens SchlossmannDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany. Jens.Schlossmann@ur.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO/cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-regulated cellular mechanisms are involved in a variety of (patho-) physiological processes. One of the main effector molecules in this system, proteinkinase G (PKG), serves as a molecular switch by phosphorylating different target proteins and thereby turning them on or off. To date, only a few interaction partners of PKG have been described although the identification of protein-protein interactions (PPI) is indispensable for the understanding of cellular processes and diseases. Conventionally used methods to detect PPIs exhibit several disadvantages, e.g., co-immunoprecipitations, which depend on suitable high-affinity antibodies. Therefore, we established a cell-based protein-fragment complementation assay (PCA) for the identification of PKG target proteins. Here, a reporter protein (

Indexed as

AnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsCOS CellsCyclic GMPCyclic GMP-Dependent Protein KinasesCyclic GMP-Dependent Protein Kinase Type ILuciferasesMiceNitric OxidePhosphorylationProtein Interaction MappingRGS ProteinsCyclic GMPCyclic GMP-Dependent Protein KinasesCyclic GMP-Dependent Protein Kinase Type ILuciferasesNitric OxideRgs2 protein, mouseRGS ProteinscGKcGMPluciferasePCAPKGprotein–protein interactionRGS2

Identifiers

PMID29649180
PMCPMC5979328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.