Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29649021›Full record

Trial reportPediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies2018

Impressions of Early Mobilization of Critically Ill Children-Clinician, Patient, and Family Perspectives.

Katina Zheng, Aimee Sarti, Sama Boles, Saoirse Cameron, Robert Carlisi, Heather Clark, Adeeb Khawaji, Saif Awladthani, Samah Al-Harbi, Karen Choong

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Early Protocolized Versus Usual Care Rehabilitation for Pediatric Neurocritical Care Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2019
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Consent models in Canadian critical care randomized controlled trials: a scoping review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Return to Ambulation After Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A First "Step" in Assessing the Impact of Early Mobility.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Multistakeholder Qualitative Research Methods to Impact Culture of Care Practices in the ICU.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Katina ZhengDepartment of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada.
Aimee SartiDepartment of Critical Care, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sama BolesDepartment of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada.
Saoirse CameronUniversity of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Robert CarlisiUniversity of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Heather ClarkDepartment of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada.
Adeeb KhawajiDepartment of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada.
Saif AwladthaniDepartment of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada.
Samah Al-HarbiDepartment of Pediatric, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Karen ChoongDepartment of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada.
McMaster University · CAWestern University · CAKing Abdulaziz University · SAOttawa Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo understand patient, family caregiver, and clinician impressions of early mobilization, the perceived barriers and facilitators to its implementation, and the use of in-bed cycling as a method of mobilization.

designA qualitative study, conducted as part of the Early Exercise in Critically ill Youth and Children, a preliminary Evaluation (wEECYCLE) Pilot randomized controlled trial.

settingMcMaster Children's Hospital PICU, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

participantsClinicians (i.e., physicians, nurses, and physiotherapists), family caregivers, and capable patients age greater than or equal to 8 years old who were enrolled in a clinical trial of early mobilization in critically ill children (wEECYCLE).

interventionSemistructured, face-to-face interviews using a customized interview guide for clinicians, caregivers, and patients respectively, conducted after exposure to the early mobilization intervention. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThirty-seven participants were interviewed (19 family caregivers, four patients, and 14 clinicians). Family caregivers and clinicians described similar interrelated themes representing barriers to mobilization, namely low prioritization of mobilization by the medical team, safety concerns, the lack of physiotherapy resources, and low patient motivation. Key facilitators were family trust in the healthcare team, team engagement, an a priori belief that physical activity is important, and participation in research. Increased familiarity and specific features such as the virtual reality component and ability to execute passive and or active mobilization helped to engage critically ill children in in-bed cycling.

conclusionsClinicians, patients, and families were highly supportive of mobilization in critically ill children; however, concerns were identified with respect to how and when to execute this practice. Understanding key stakeholder perspectives enables the development of strategies to facilitate the implementation of early mobilization and in-bed cycling, not just in the context of a clinical trial but also within the culture of practice in a PICU.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeCaregiversChildCritical IllnessEarly AmbulationFemaleHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricMaleParentsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID29649021
OpenAlexW2799733802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.