Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29648928›Full record

ArticlePsychological science2018

An Optimistic Outlook Creates a Rosy Past: The Impact of Episodic Simulation on Subsequent Memory.

Aleea L Devitt, Daniel L Schacter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Emotional future simulations: neural and cognitive perspectives.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The seven sins of memory: an update.Memory (Hove, England) · 2022
    Review
  7. Looking on the Bright Side: Aging and the Impact of Emotional Future Simulation on Subsequent Memory.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. Implicit Memory, Constructive Memory, and Imagining the Future: A Career Perspective.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aleea L DevittDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University.
Daniel L SchacterDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University.

Funding

Episodic Retrieval and Problem Solving in AgingR01AG008441 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI SCHACTER, DANIEL L · 1989 to 2022
$3.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG008441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People frequently engage in future thinking in everyday life, but it is unknown how simulating an event in advance changes how that event is remembered once it takes place. To initiate study of this important topic, we conducted two experiments in which participants simulated emotional events before learning the hypothetical outcome of each event via narratives. Memory was assessed for emotional details contained in those narratives. Positive simulation resulted in a liberal response bias for positive information and a conservative bias for negative information. Events preceded by positive simulation were considered more favorably in retrospect. In contrast, negative simulation had no impact on subsequent memory. Results were similar across an immediate and delayed memory test and for past and future simulation. These results provide novel insights into the cognitive consequences of episodic future simulation and build on the optimism-bias literature by showing that adopting a favorable outlook results in a rosy memory.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicOptimismAdultEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleThinkingYoung Adultemotionepisodic future simulationepisodic memoryfuture thinkingopen dataopen materialspositivity bias

Identifiers

PMID29648928
PMCPMC5993572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.