ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018
Inference of the human polyadenylation code.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- PolyAseqTrap: a universal tool for genome-wide identification and quantification of polyadenylation sites from different 3' end sequencing data.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Deep learning for regulatory genomics: a survey of models, challenges, and applications.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Review
- Single-nucleus transcriptome atlas of orbitofrontal cortex in ALS with a deep learning-based decoding of alternative polyadenylation mechanisms.Cell genomics · 2025Article
- Predicting RNA-seq coverage from DNA sequence as a unifying model of gene regulation.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- Delineating yeast cleavage and polyadenylation signals using deep learning.Genome research · 2024Article
- Article
- Big data and deep learning for RNA biology.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Known sequence features explain half of all human gene ends.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023Article
- A Survey on Methods for Predicting Polyadenylation Sites from DNA Sequences, Bulk RNA-seq, and Single-cell RNA-seq.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023Review
- Applications of deep learning in understanding gene regulation.Cell reports methods · 2023Review
- Deciphering the impact of genetic variation on human polyadenylation using APARENT2.Genome biology · 2022Article
- Regulating the regulator: a survey of mechanisms from transcription to translation controlling expression of mammalian cell cycle kinase Aurora A.Open biology · 2022Review
- DeeReCT-APA: Prediction of Alternative Polyadenylation Site Usage Through Deep Learning.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Leveraging omic features with F3UTER enables identification of unannotated 3'UTRs for synaptic genes.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Genomics enters the deep learning era.PeerJ · 2022Review
- Aptardi predicts polyadenylation sites in sample-specific transcriptomes using high-throughput RNA sequencing and DNA sequence.Nature communications · 2021Article
- AI applications in functional genomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- DeepPASTA: deep neural network based polyadenylation site analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Sequence determinants of polyadenylation-mediated regulation.Genome research · 2019Article
- Alternative cleavage and polyadenylation in health and disease.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Processing of transcripts at the 3'-end involves cleavage at a polyadenylation site followed by the addition of a poly(A)-tail. By selecting which site is cleaved, the process of alternative polyadenylation enables genes to produce transcript isoforms with different 3'-ends. To facilitate the identification and treatment of disease-causing mutations that affect polyadenylation and to understand the sequence determinants underlying this regulatory process, a computational model that can accurately predict polyadenylation patterns from genomic features is desirable. Results: Previous works have focused on identifying candidate polyadenylation sites and classifying tissue-specific sites. By training on how multiple sites in genes are competitively selected for polyadenylation from 3'-end sequencing data, we developed a deep learning model that can predict the tissue-specific strength of a polyadenylation site in the 3' untranslated region of the human genome given only its genomic sequence. We demonstrate the model's broad utility on multiple tasks, without any application-specific training. The model can be used to predict which polyadenylation site is more likely to be selected in genes with multiple sites. It can be used to scan the 3' untranslated region to find candidate polyadenylation sites. It can be used to classify the pathogenicity of variants near annotated polyadenylation sites in ClinVar. It can also be used to anticipate the effect of antisense oligonucleotide experiments to redirect polyadenylation. We provide analysis on how different features affect the model's predictive performance and a method to identify sensitive regions of the genome at the single-based resolution that can affect polyadenylation regulation. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.