ReviewJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2018
Avoiding bias in trials in which allocation ratio is varied.
Review in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mobile Intervention for Increasing COVID-19 Testing in K-12 Schools Serving Disadvantaged Communities: Randomized Controlled Trial of SCALE-UP Counts.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Individual supported work placements (ReISE) for improving sustained return to work in unemployed people with persistent pain: an internal pilot study of a cohort randomised controlled approach.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2024Article
- Article
- Counting on U training to enhance trusting relationships and mental health literacy among business advisors: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Meating Conflict: Toward a Model of Ambivalence-Motivated Reduction of Meat Consumption.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Errors in the implementation, analysis, and reporting of randomization within obesity and nutrition research: a guide to their avoidance.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2021Review
- Comparative poisson clinical trials of multiple experimental treatments vs a single control using the negative multinomial distribution.Statistics in medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Including non-concurrent control patients in the analysis of platform trials: is it worth it?BMC medical research methodology · 2020Article
- Article
- Change in study randomization allocation needs to be included in statistical analysis: comment on 'Randomized controlled trial of weight loss versus usual care on telomere length in women with breast cancer: the lifestyle, exercise, and nutrition (LEAN) study'.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2019Article
- A doctor who regenerates.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.