Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29644918›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2018

Assessment of clinical sepsis-associated biomarkers in a septic mouse model.

Jin-Ling Li, Ge Li, Xi-Zhong Jing, Yun-Feng Li, Qiu-Ying Ye, Huan-Huan Jia, Shu-Hua Liu, Xue-Jiao Li, Hang Li, Ren Huang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sympathetic regulation of the host immune response to bacterial sepsis.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Advances in Rodent Experimental Models of Sepsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Development of a High-Throughput Urosepsis Mouse Model.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jin-Ling Li1 School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China.
Ge Li2 Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China.
Xi-Zhong Jing1 School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China.
Yun-Feng Li2 Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China.
Qiu-Ying Ye3 Qingyuan Polytechnic, Qingyuan, Guangdong province, China.
Huan-Huan Jia2 Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China.
Shu-Hua Liu2 Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China.
Xue-Jiao Li2 Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China.
Hang Li2 Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China.
Ren Huang2 Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China.
Yu Zhang2 Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0008-7057
Hui Wang1 School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Clinical sepsis-associated biomarkers were utilized in a cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) septic mouse model to provide a reference for investigating pathophysiological mechanisms and evaluating novel therapeutic interventions for sepsis. Methods Sepsis in mice was induced by CLP, and clinical biomarkers were evaluated (survival rate, blood physiological and biochemical indices, cytokines, hepatorenal function parameters, and blood coagulation). Results The mortality rate was >70%. The body temperature, blood pressure, and heart rate decreased within 48 h. Low lactic acid was found at 8 h. The CLP mice showed typical inflammatory symptoms with decreased white blood cells and procalcitonin and increased levels of soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-α, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, MIP-1β, and MIP-2. The platelet count and activated partial thromboplastin time significantly decreased, and the prothrombin time and prothrombin time-international normalized ratio markedly increased. Phenotypes of multiple organ dysfunction were found in the CLP model, including increased liver alanine aminotransferase and aspartate transaminase; significantly reduced total protein, globulin, and serum albumin; increased blood urea nitrogen and creatinine; and decreased blood glucose. Conclusion The clinical features of the CLP mouse model were similar to those of human patients with sepsis.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAspartate AminotransferasesBiomarkersCytokinesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSepsisAspartate AminotransferasesBiomarkersCytokinesbiomarkerscecal ligation and puncture (CLP)clinical indicatorsdiagnostic criteriamouse modelSepsis

Identifiers

PMID29644918
PMCPMC6023044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.