Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29644569›Full record

ArticleRice (New York, N.Y.)2018

Evaluation and breeding application of six brown planthopper resistance genes in rice maintainer line Jin 23B.

Haichao Jiang, Jie Hu, Zhi Li, Jia Liu, Guanjun Gao, Qinglu Zhang, Jinghua Xiao, Yuqing He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rice (New York, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Breaking genetic linkage barriers to improve brown planthopper resistance and grain yield in japonica rice.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haichao JiangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), and National Center of Crop Molecular Breeding, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Jie HuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), and National Center of Crop Molecular Breeding, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Zhi LiNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), and National Center of Crop Molecular Breeding, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Jia LiuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), and National Center of Crop Molecular Breeding, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Guanjun GaoNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), and National Center of Crop Molecular Breeding, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Qinglu ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), and National Center of Crop Molecular Breeding, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Jinghua XiaoNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), and National Center of Crop Molecular Breeding, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Yuqing HeNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), and National Center of Crop Molecular Breeding, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China. yqhe@mail.hzau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4855-5991

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe brown planthopper (BPH), an insect species that feeds on rice plants (Oryza sativa L.), is one of the most destructive insect pests of rice. BPH can be controlled with chemical pesticides, but they are expensive in terms of the cost and environmental hazards. Hence, utilization of resistance genes in resistant varieties is considered as a more economical and eco-friendly effective method for control.

resultsIn this study, six dominant BPH-resistance genes (Bph3, Bph14, Bph15, Bph18, Bph20 and Bph21) were introduced into an elite indica rice cultivar Jin 23B using the marker-assisted selection (MAS) method of breeding. One line combining Bph14 and Bph15 and six single gene introgression lines were used to evaluate the gene effects based on three parameters: seedling and tillering resistance of the rice genotypes, honeydew weight, and BPH survival rate. Among all improved lines, combination of Bph14 and Bph15 had the largest effect in conferring resistance to BPH. Bioassays showed that the order of the gene effects was Bph14/Bph15 > Bph15 ≥ Bph14 ≥ Bph20 ≥ Bph21 ≥ Bph3 > Bph18 > none at the rice seedling stage. The pyramided or single-gene introgression lines showed enhanced resistance relative to the control. Furthermore, field trial data demonstrated that yields of improved Jin 23B lines were similar to the control under BPH-free field conditions.

conclusionsEach of the BPH resistance genes reduced BPH growth and development, and was effective at both the seedling and tillering growth stages. These lines can be used in rice hybrid and production in China.

Indexed as

Brown planthopper resistanceGene introgressionMarker-assisted selection (MAS)Oryza sativa L

Identifiers

PMID29644569
PMCPMC5895560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.