ReviewInsights into imaging2018
Imaging of urgencies and emergencies in the lung cancer patient.
Review in Insights into imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- HFSUNet: A UNet architecture optimized for precise segmentation of pneumonia lesion boundaries.iScience · 2026Article
- Article
- Superior Vena Cava Syndrome and Wallstent: A Systematic Review.Annals of vascular diseases · 2022Article
- Thrombotic superior vena cava syndrome: a national emergency department database study.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2022Article
- Lung Cancer Classification and Prediction Using Machine Learning and Image Processing.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Iatrogenic superior vena cava syndrome with concomitant deep vein thrombosis of azygos and hemiazygos veins.Radiology case reports · 2021Article
- Adaptive Diagnosis of Lung Cancer by Deep Learning Classification Using Wilcoxon Gain and Generator.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
- Emergency room imaging in patients with genitourinary cancers: analysis of the spectrum of CT findings and their relation to patient outcomes.Emergency radiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer patients often experience potentially life-threatening medical urgencies and emergencies, which may be a direct or indirect result of the underlying malignancy. This pictorial review addresses the most common thoracic, neurological and musculoskeletal medical emergencies in lung cancer patients, including superior vena cava syndrome, pulmonary embolism, spontaneous pneumothorax, cardiac tamponade, massive haemoptysis, central airway obstruction, oesophagorespiratory fistula, malignant spinal cord compression, carcinomatous meningitis, cerebral herniation and pathological fracture. Emphasis is placed on imaging findings, the role of different imaging techniques and a brief discussion of epidemiology, pathophysiology and therapeutic options. Since early diagnosis is important for adequate patient management and prognosis, radiologists have a crucial role in recognising and communicating these urgencies and emergencies. TEACHING POINTS: • Multiplanar multidetector computed tomography is the imaging examination of choice for thoracic urgencies and emergencies. • Magnetic resonance imaging is the imaging modality of choice for investigating central nervous system emergencies. • Urgencies and emergencies can be the initial manifestation of lung cancer. • Radiologists have a crucial role in recognising and in communicating these urgencies/emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.