Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29644509›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2018

Applications of Colon Capsule Endoscopy.

Shabana F Pasha

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Second-generation capsule endoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps: An updated systematic review and comparative meta-analysis of prospective studies.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Clinical utility of colon capsule endoscopy: a moving target?Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Video Capsule Endoscopy in Gastroenterology.Gastroenterology research · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Detection of Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Neoplasia by Multi-target Stool DNA.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Colon Cancer: A Clinician's Perspective in 2019.Gastroenterology research · 2020
    Review
  15. Miniature gastrointestinal endoscopy: Now and the future.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shabana F PashaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA. pasha.shabana@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis is a review of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) with a focus on its recent developments, technological improvements, and current and potential future indications. RECENT

findingsBased on the current literature, CCE II demonstrates comparable polyp detection rates as optical colonoscopy and CT colonography, and improved cost-effectiveness. The main limitation to patient acceptance is the requirement of a rigorous bowel preparation. Preliminary studies show good correlation between CCE and optical colonoscopy for assessment of colonic disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). CCE II is currently FDA, approved as an adjunctive test in patients with prior incomplete colonoscopy, and in the evaluation of patients with suspected lower gastrointestinal bleeding. The test is approved in Europe as one of the options for average-risk colorectal cancer screening, and high-risk screening in patients with contraindications or unwilling to undergo colonoscopy. CCE has a potential role in the evaluation and monitoring of colonic disease activity in IBD. Future technological advances should focus on minimizing bowel preparation, improvement in reading times, and development of therapeutic capabilities. • With technological improvements, the second-generation colon capsule has a significantly higher sensitivity than the first-generation capsule for detection of colon polyps. • Colon capsule endoscopy has been approved in Europe as an option for average-risk colorectal cancer screening, and high-risk screening in patients with contraindications or unwilling to undergo colonoscopy. • Colon capsule endoscopy has received FDA approval as an option for colorectal cancer screening in patients with prior incomplete colonoscopy, and in evaluation of patients with suspected lower gastrointestinal bleeding. • Colon capsule endoscopy may have a role in evaluation and monitoring of inflammatory bowel disease. • Colon capsule endoscopy currently requires a bowel preparation that is more rigorous than colonoscopy.

Indexed as

Capsule EndoscopyCatharticsColonic DiseasesColonic PolypsColonography, Computed TomographicColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesCatharticsBowel preparationColon capsuleColon capsule endoscopyColonoscopyColorectal cancer screeningCrohn diseaseCT colonographyIncomplete colonoscopyInflammatory bowel diseaseUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID29644509
OpenAlexW2797459014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.