Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29644477›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2018

The Selective Use of Radiation Therapy in Rectal Cancer Patients.

Andrew Martella, Christopher Willett, Manisha Palta, Brian Czito

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Penile metastasis from rectal carcinoma: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew MartellaDuke Cancer Center, Medicine Circle, Duke University Hospital, Box 3085, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Christopher WillettDuke Cancer Center, Medicine Circle, Duke University Hospital, Box 3085, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Manisha PaltaDuke Cancer Center, Medicine Circle, Duke University Hospital, Box 3085, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Brian CzitoDuke Cancer Center, Medicine Circle, Duke University Hospital, Box 3085, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. Brian.czito@duke.edu.
Duke University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewColorectal cancer has a high global incidence, and standard treatment employs a multimodality approach. In addition to cure, minimizing treatment-related toxicity and improving the therapeutic ratio is a common goal. The following article addresses the potential of omitting radiotherapy in select rectal cancer patients. RECENT

findingsOmission of radiotherapy in rectal cancer is analyzed in the context of historical findings, as well as more recent data describing risk stratification of stage II-III disease, surgical optimization, imaging limitations, improvement in systemic chemotherapeutic agents, and contemporary studies evaluating selective omission of radiotherapy. A subset of rectal cancer patients exists that may be considered low to intermediate risk for locoregional recurrence. With appropriate staging, surgical technique, and possibly improved systemic therapy, it may be feasible to selectively omit radiotherapy in these patients. Current imaging limitations as well as evidence of increased locoregional recurrence following radiotherapy omission lend us to continue supporting the standard treatment of approach of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy followed by surgical resection until additional improvements and prospective evidence can support otherwise.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyFluorouracilHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingRectal NeoplasmsFluorouracilImaging rectal cancerMinimizing toxicityPrognostic factors rectal cancerRadiotherapy omissionRectal cancerRisk stratification rectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID29644477
OpenAlexW2797730692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.