Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29644427›Full record

Observational studyDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2018

[Gender-specific differences of the early postoperative and oncosurgical long-term outcome in rectal cancer-data obtained in a prospective multicenter observational study].

J Katzenstein, R Steinert, H Ptok, R Otto, I Gastinger, H Lippert, F Meyer

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J KatzensteinAN-Institut für Qualitätssicherung, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
R SteinertAN-Institut für Qualitätssicherung, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
H PtokAN-Institut für Qualitätssicherung, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
R OttoAN-Institut für Qualitätssicherung, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
I GastingerAN-Institut für Qualitätssicherung, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
H LippertAN-Institut für Qualitätssicherung, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
F MeyerAN-Institut für Qualitätssicherung, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Magdeburg, Deutschland. frank.meyer@med.ovgu.de.
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DEInstitut für Bodenkultur und Pflanzenbau · DESalzgitter Group (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGender-specific aspects have been increasingly considered in clinical medicine, also in oncological surgery.

aimTo analyze gender-specific differences of early postoperative and oncological outcomes after rectal cancer resection based on data obtained in a prospective multicenter observational study. PATIENTS AND

methodsAs part of the multicenter prospective observational study "Quality assurance in primary rectal cancer", data on tumor site, exogenic and endogenic risk factors, neoadjuvant treatment, surgical procedures, tumor stage, intraoperative and postoperative complications of patients with the histological diagnosis of rectal cancer were registered. Data from the years 2005-2006 and 2010-2011 were investigated with respect to gender-specific differences of postoperative morbidity, hospital mortality, local recurrency rate, disease-free and overall survival by univariable and multivariable analyses.

resultsOverall, data from 10,657 patients were evaluated: 60.9% of the patients were male, who were significantly younger (p < 0.001). Men had a significantly higher rate of alcohol (p < 0.001) and nicotine abuse (p < 0.001) as well as a trend to a higher body mass index (BMI) compared with women. Although, there was no significant difference in the distribution of various tumor stages comparing men and women, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was used significantly more often in male patients (p < 0.001). In addition, male patients underwent an abdominoperineal rectum exstirpation more often, whereas creation of an enterostoma and Hartmann's procedure were more frequently used in women (p < 0.001 each). Multivariate analysis revealed that male patients developed a higher overall morbidity (odds ratio, OR: 1.5; p < 0.001) during both study periods and from 2010-2011 a higher hospital mortality (OR: 1.8; p < 0.001). After a median follow-up period of 36 months, gender did not have a significant impact on overall survival, disease-free survival or on the local tumor recurrency. The 5‑year overall survival was 60.5%, disease-free survival 63.8% and local recurrency rate was 5%.

conclusionIndependent of other variables, gender differences were found with respect to early postoperative outcome but not to oncological long-term results after surgery of rectal cancer.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRectumTreatment OutcomeGender differenceOutcomeRectal cancerRisk factorsSurvival

Identifiers

PMID29644427
OpenAlexW2797240997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.