ArticleActa neurochirurgica2018
The Wessex modified Richmond Sedation Scale as a novel tool for monitoring patients at risk of malignant MCA syndrome.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical timing and indications for decompressive craniectomy in malignant stroke: results from a single-center retrospective analysis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Wessex Modified Richmond Sedation Scale (WMRSS) has been developed with the aim of improving the early identification of patients requiring decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery syndrome (MMS). The objective of this study was to evaluate the WMRSS against the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS).
methodsA retrospective study was conducted of patients admitted to our unit for observation of MMS. Data were obtained on WMRSS and GCS recordings from admission up to 120-h post-ictus. Patients' meeting inclusion criteria were recommended for theatre based on subsequent deteriorations in consciousness on either WMRSS or GCS from a 6-h post-stroke baseline, after ruling out non-neurological causes.
resultsApproximately, 60% of those eligible for monitoring were not recommended for theatre, and none died; however, these patients continued to demonstrate some variability in recorded conscious level. Patients requiring surgical intervention showed earlier drops in WMRSS compared to GCS. Neither the GCS nor the WMRSS on admission predicted the subsequent need for decompressive surgery. There was no increase in mortality with the introduction of WMRSS.
conclusionsWMRSS adds value to monitoring MMS by indicating need for surgery prior to GCS. Early reduction in consciousness may not be sufficient for proceeding to surgical intervention, but subsequent reduction in consciousness may be a more appropriate criterion for surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.