ReviewRegenerative biomaterials2018
Effect of microporosity on scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Review in Regenerative biomaterials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
111 citing papers in PubMed.
- Direct ink writing of tantalum: tailorable hierarchical porous scaffold for osteogenesis.National science review · 2026Article
- Protein adsorption at material interface: mechanistic design framework for engineering ceramic scaffolds for bone repair applications.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Review
- Dual-Functional Triphasic Composite Scaffolds for Enhanced Antibacterial and Osteogenic Performance in Preventing Osteomyelitis Recurrence.ACS omega · 2026Article
- SA/HA double-network hydrogel combined with PVDF electret membrane enhances osteogenic differentiation of DPSCs and promotes mandibular bone defect repair.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- Strontium and gallium doping enhancesMaterials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Recent advances in immunoregulatory biomaterials for tendon healing: From immune remodeling to functional regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Polymethyl methacrylate-hydroxyapatite: A viable non-metallic alternative for dental implants? Comprehensive surface characterization.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2026Article
- Engineering a Bioactive PMMA-Silica Hybrid Scaffold for Enhanced Bone Regeneration.ACS applied bio materials · 2026Article
- Sculpting the Future of Bone: The Evolution of Absorbable Materials in Orthopedics.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Bone-Healing Enhancement Using Particulate Biomaterials and Fibrin-Based Compounds: A Narrative Literature Review of Evidence in Animal Models.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The 3D printed biphasic scaffolds incorporating epimedin C promotes osteochondral regeneration in osteoarthritis rats.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- The Impact of Post-Printing Hydration in NaCl Solution on the Properties of Binder Jet 3D-Printed Calcium Sulfate and Its Converted Hydroxyapatite.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Bionic Nanostructures Create Mechanical Signals to Mediate the Composite Structural Bone Regeneration Through Multi-System Regulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Bioactive Glass Microscaffolds Fabricated by Two-Photon Lithography.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- 3D-Printed Cell-Instructive Scaffolds Based onACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Calcium Phosphate Honeycomb Scaffolds with Tailored Microporous Walls Using Phase Separation-Assisted Digital Light Processing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Osteogenic Potential of 3D-Printed Porous Poly(lactide-ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Bioinspired Nanoscale 3D Printing of Calcium Phosphates Using Bone Prenucleation Clusters.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Bone-Regenerating Capacity of Chitosan Membrane and Chitosan Foam Scaffolds in Critical Size Defects: In Vitro and In Vivo Study.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Fabrication andRSC advances · 2025Article
51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microporosity has a critical role in improving the osteogenesis of scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Although the exact mechanism, by which it promotes new bone formation, is not well recognized yet, the related hypothesis can be found in many previous studies. This review presents those possible mechanisms about how the microporosity enhances the osteogenic-related functions of cells
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.