Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29643959›Full record

ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2018

Hybrid appendectomy with classic trocar on McBurney's point.

Mehmet Emin Gunes, Feyzullah Ersoz, Yigit Duzkoylu, Soykan Arikan, Coskun Cakir, Ali Emre Nayci

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Spinal/epidural block as an alternative to general anesthesia for laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized clinical study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mehmet Emin GunesGeneral Surgery Department, Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Feyzullah ErsozGeneral Surgery Clinic, Istanbul Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Yigit DuzkoyluGastroenterological Surgery Department, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Soykan ArikanGeneral Surgery Clinic, Istanbul Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Coskun CakirGeneral Surgery Clinic, Istanbul Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali Emre NayciGeneral Surgery Clinic, Istanbul Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRTürkiye Yüksek İhtisas Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAppendectomy is still the most commonly performed intra-abdominal operation worldwide. Interestingly, it has not reached the same popularity as other laparoscopic surgical procedures. Although multiple techniques have been described, a standard approach has not been described for the laparoscopic technique yet.

aimTo perform hybrid appendectomy for acute appendicitis on McBurney's point, aiming to perform an easier and quicker procedure while limiting the trauma to the abdominal wall by obtaining the advantages of both laparoscopic and open techniques. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated the results of 24 patients on whom we had performed hybrid appendectomy with an optical trocar on McBurney's point for acute appendicitis in 1 year in terms of demographics, operative time, complications, hospital stay and cosmetic results.

resultsTwenty-one of the patients underwent hybrid appendectomy with a one-optic trocar on McBurney's point. The mean operative time was 21.4 ±6.2 min. We did not encounter any postoperative complications in any of the patients. The median hospital stay was 1.2 ±1.0 days. The postoperative scar was minimal.

conclusionsThis technique is defined in the literature for the first time, and it is easy and feasible for the surgeons. It may reduce the operative time and costs when compared to the conventional laparoscopic technique, but prospective studies with more patients are needed for more certain results.

Indexed as

appendectomyconventionalhybridlaparoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID29643959
PMCPMC5890840
OpenAlexW2758983113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.