Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29643880›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences

Intra-Operative Predictors of difficult cholecystectomy and Conversion to Open Cholecystectomy - A New Scoring System.

Nauman Ahmed, Maaz Ul Hassan, Maham Tahira, Abdul Samad, Hamad Naeem Rana

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04994171 (Operative Difficulty Grading Scale for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in BPKIHS), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04994171 completednot on this map

Operative Difficulty Grading Scale for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in BPKIHS

TypeobservationalSponsorB.P. Koirala Institute of Health SciencesRan2020 to 2021Enrolled74ConditionsLaparoscopic Cholecystectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nauman AhmedNauman Ahmed, Consultant General & Laproscopic Surgeon, Surgical Unit II, Shalamar Institute of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
Maaz Ul HassanMaaz ul Hassan, Assistant Professor, Surgical Unit II, Shalamar Institute of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
Maham TahiraMaham Tahira, Medical Officer, Surgical Unit II, Shalamar Institute of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
Abdul SamadAbdul Samad, Shaheen Research Group, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hamad Naeem RanaHamad Naeem Rana, Professor of Surgery, Surgical Unit II, Shalamar Institute of Health Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
Shalamar Hospital · PKShah Abdul Latif University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the intra-operative scoring system to predict difficult cholecystectomy and conversion to open surgery.

methodsThis descriptive study was conducted from March 2016 to August, 2016 in the Department of Surgery, Shalimar Hospital. The study recruited 120 patients of either gender, age greater than 18 years and indicated for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Intra-operatively all patients were evaluated using the new scoring system. The scoring system included five aspects; appearance and adhesion of Gall Bladder (GB), distension or contracture degree of GB, ease in access, local or septic complications, and time required for cystic artery and duct identification. The scoring system ranges from 0 to 10, classified as score of <2 being considered easy, 2 to 4 moderate, 5-7 very difficult, and 8 to 10, extreme. Patient demographic data (i.e. age, gender), co-morbidities, intra-operative scores using the scoring system and conversion to open were recorded. The data was analysed using statistical analysis software SPSS (IBM).

resultsAmong one hundred and twenty participants, sixty seven percent were females and the mean age (years) was 43.05 ± 14.16. Co-morbidities were present in twenty percent patients with eleven diagnosed with diabetes, six with hypertension and five with both hypertension and diabetes. The conversion rate to open surgery was 6.7%. The overall mean intra-operative scores were 3.52 ± 2.23; however significant difference was seen in mean operative score of converted to open and those not converted to open (8.00 ± 0.92 Vs. 3.20 V 1.92; p-value = 0.001). Among eight cases converted to open, three (37.5%) were in very difficult category while five (62.5%) were in extreme category. Moreover, age greater than 40 years and being diabetic were also the risk factors for conversion to open surgery.

conclusionThe new intra-operative scoring system is a valuable assessment tool to predict difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conversion parameters to open surgery and its utility could improve patient's clinical outcome indicated for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Indexed as

ConversionIntra-operativeLaparoscopic cholecystectomyOpen surgeryScoring system

Identifiers

PMID29643880
PMCPMC5857031
OpenAlexW2793728142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.