ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2018
Cost-effectiveness of the recommended medical intervention for the treatment of dysmenorrhea and endometriosis in Japan.
Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical practice guidelines for endometriosis in Japan (The 3rd edition).The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2022Guideline
- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug resistance in dysmenorrhea: a study of prevalence, predictors, and alternative pain management among Nigerian female students.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Financial burden of menstrual and menopausal symptoms: productivity loss from absenteeism and presenteeism among working-age women.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Economic evaluation of a digital symptom checker for endometriosis using a Markov decision process model.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Delays and Economic Burden in Japanese Women with Endometriosis: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- A Retrospective Observational Study on Telemedicine in Prescribing Low-Dose Pills for Patients with Dysmenorrhea.Telemedicine reports · 2024Article
- Use of the visual analogue scale for health state valuation: a scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Prevalence of Primary Dysmenorrhoea and Its Impact on Academic Performance among Croatian Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2023Article
- The State of Health and the Quality of Life in Women Suffering from Endometriosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Pain management and coping strategies for primary dysmenorrhea: A qualitative study among female nursing students.Nursing open · 2022Article
- Article
- Living with Restrictions. The Perspective of Nursing Students with Primary Dysmenorrhea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Why Do Some Spanish Nursing Students with Menstrual Pain Fail to Consult Healthcare Professionals?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Type of Dysmenorrhea, Menstrual Characteristics and Symptoms in Nursing Students in Southern Spain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Trends and characteristics of epithelial ovarian cancer in Japan between 2002 and 2015: A JSGO-JSOG joint study.Gynecologic oncology · 2019Observational
- The Impact of Dysmenorrhea on Quality of Life Among Spanish Female University Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThis study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of early physician consultation and guideline-based intervention to prevent endometriosis and/or disease progression using oral contraceptive (OC) and progestin compared to follow-up of self-care for dysmenorrhea in Japan.
methodsA yearly-transmitted Markov model of five major health states with four sub-medical states was constructed. Transition probabilities among health and medical states were derived from Japanese epidemiological patient surveys and converted to appropriate parameters for inputting into the model. The dysmenorrhea and endometriosis-associated direct costs included inpatient, outpatient visit, surgery, and medication (OC agents, over-the-counter drugs), etc. The utility measure for patients with phase I-IV endometriosis comprised a visual analogue scale. We estimated the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) at a time horizon of 23 years. An annual discount rate at 3% for both cost and outcome was considered.
resultsThe base case outcomes indicated that the intervention would be more cost-effective than self-care, as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) yielded 115,000 JPY per QALY gained from the healthcare payers' perspective and the societal monetary value (SMV) was approximately positive 3,130,000 JPY, favoring the intervention in the cost-benefit estimate. A tornado diagram depicting the stochastic sensitivity analysis of the ICER and SMV from both the healthcare payers' and societal perspectives confirmed the robustness of the base case. A probabilistic analysis resulting from 10,000-time Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated efficiency at willingness-to-pay thresholds in more than 90% of the iterations.
conclusionsThe present analysis demonstrated that early physician consultation and guideline-based intervention would be more cost-effective than self-care in preventing endometriosis and/or disease progression for patients with dysmenorrhea in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.