Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29643505›Full record

ArticleNature2018

High male sexual investment as a driver of extinction in fossil ostracods.

Maria João Fernandes Martins, T Markham Puckett, Rowan Lockwood, John P Swaddle, Gene Hunt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Why high-condition males might be bad news for females and populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Diversification Slowdown in theFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maria João Fernandes MartinsDepartment of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA.
T Markham PuckettDepartment of Geography and Geology, The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Rowan LockwoodDepartment of Geology, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA.
John P SwaddleDepartment of Biology, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA.
Gene HuntDepartment of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA. hunte@si.edu.
National Museum of Natural History · USUniversity of Southern Mississippi · USWilliam & Mary · USWilliams (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual selection favours traits that confer advantages in the competition for mates. In many cases, such traits are costly to produce and maintain, because the costs help to enforce the honesty of these signals and cues

Indexed as

Extinction, BiologicalFossilsMating Preference, AnimalSelection, GeneticAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBody SizeCrustaceaFemaleMaleModels, BiologicalReproductionRisk FactorsSex Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID29643505
OpenAlexW2796808320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.