Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29643480›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2018

The basal ganglia and the cerebellum: nodes in an integrated network.

Andreea C Bostan, Peter L Strick

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 412 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
412citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
49.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

412 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 764 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Meta-analysis of the relationship between the number and location of perivascular spaces in the brain and cognitive function.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Regional Cerebellar Volumetrics in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: An ENIGMA-OCD Study.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Article

352 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreea C BostanSystems Neuroscience Center and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. acb42@pitt.edu.
Peter L StrickSystems Neuroscience Center and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. strickp@pitt.edu.
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

ResourceP40OD010996 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STRICK, PETER · 2012 to 2024
$11.0M
PREMOTOR AREAS IN THE FRONTAL LOBER01NS024328 · NINDS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI STRICK, PETER · 1987 to 2015
$8.9M
Surgery Core - NINDS Institutional Core Grants to Support Neuroscience ResearchP30NS076405 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STRICK, PETER · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NIH HHS P40 OD010996NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS076405NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS024328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The basal ganglia and the cerebellum are considered to be distinct subcortical systems that perform unique functional operations. The outputs of the basal ganglia and the cerebellum influence many of the same cortical areas but do so by projecting to distinct thalamic nuclei. As a consequence, the two subcortical systems were thought to be independent and to communicate only at the level of the cerebral cortex. Here, we review recent data showing that the basal ganglia and the cerebellum are interconnected at the subcortical level. The subthalamic nucleus in the basal ganglia is the source of a dense disynaptic projection to the cerebellar cortex. Similarly, the dentate nucleus in the cerebellum is the source of a dense disynaptic projection to the striatum. These observations lead to a new functional perspective that the basal ganglia, the cerebellum and the cerebral cortex form an integrated network. This network is topographically organized so that the motor, cognitive and affective territories of each node in the network are interconnected. This perspective explains how synaptic modifications or abnormal activity at one node can have network-wide effects. A future challenge is to define how the unique learning mechanisms at each network node interact to improve performance.

Indexed as

AnimalsBasal GangliaCerebellumHumansModels, NeurologicalMotivationNervous System DiseasesNeural PathwaysRewardSubthalamic NucleusThalamus

Identifiers

PMID29643480
PMCPMC6503669
OpenAlexW2798091161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.