Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29643430›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Highly Interactive Brain-Computer Interface Based on Flicker-Free Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potential.

Chengcheng Han, Guanghua Xu, Jun Xie, Chaoyang Chen, Sicong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Text Sequence Stimulation for High-Speed and Comfortable SSVEP-BCI.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Research advances in non-invasive brain-computer interface control strategies].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Motion Fatigue State Detection Based on Neural Networks.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chengcheng HanSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Guanghua XuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China. ghxu@mail.xjtu.edu.cn.
Jun XieSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Chaoyang ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Sicong ZhangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual evoked potential-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have been widely investigated because of their easy system configuration and high information transfer rate (ITR). However, the uncomfortable flicker or brightness modulation of existing methods restricts the practical interactivity of BCI applications. In our study, a flicker-free steady-state motion visual evoked potential (FF-SSMVEP)-based BCI was proposed. Ring-shaped motion checkerboard patterns with oscillating expansion and contraction motions were presented by a high-refresh-rate display for visual stimuli, and the brightness of the stimuli was kept constant. Compared with SSVEPs, few harmonic responses were elicited by FF-SSMVEPs, and the frequency energy of SSMVEPs was concentrative. These FF-SSMVEPs evoked "single fundamental peak" responses after signal processing without harmonic and subharmonic peaks. More stimulation frequencies could thus be selected to elicit more responding fundamental peaks without overlap with harmonic peaks. A 40-target online SSMVEP-based BCI system was achieved that provided an ITR up to 1.52 bits per second (91.2 bits/min), and user training was not required to use this system. This study also demonstrated that the FF-SSMVEP-based BCI system has low contrast and low visual fatigue, offering a better alternative to conventional SSVEP-based BCIs.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesMotionAdultAlgorithmsElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePhotic StimulationVisual CortexYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29643430
PMCPMC5895715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.