ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2018
Nerve regeneration in the cephalopod mollusc
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vibrational spectroscopy and multiphoton microscopy for label-free visualization of nervous system degeneration and regeneration.Biophysical reviews · 2024Review
- The Importance of Animal Models in Biomedical Research: Current Insights and Applications.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- A pan-metazoan concept for adult stem cells: the wobbling Penrose landscape.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022Article
- Imaging Arm Regeneration: Label-Free Multiphoton Microscopy to Dissect the Process inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Deciphering regeneration through non-model animals: A century of experiments on cephalopod mollusks and an outlook at the future.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2021Article
- The survey and reference assisted assembly of the Octopus vulgaris genome.Scientific data · 2019Article
- Cephalopod Tissue Regeneration: Consolidating Over a Century of Knowledge.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Octopus and cephalopods are able to regenerate injured tissues. Recent advancements in the study of regeneration in cephalopods appear promising encompassing different approaches helping to decipher cellular and molecular machinery involved in the process. However, lack of specific markers to investigate degenerative/regenerative phenomena and inflammatory events occurring after damage is limiting these studies. Label-free multiphoton microscopy is applied for the first time to the transected pallial nerve of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.