ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018
Microbial decay analysis challenges interpretation of putative organ systems in Cambrian fuxianhuiids.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early evolvability in arthropod tagmosis exemplified by a new radiodont from the Burgess Shale.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Organ systems of a Cambrian euarthropod larva.Nature · 2024Article
- A multiscale approach reveals elaborate circulatory system and intermittent heartbeat in velvet worms (Onychophora).Communications biology · 2023Article
- Unparalleled details of soft tissues in a Cretaceous ant.BMC ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Neuroanatomy in a middle Cambrian mollisoniid and the ancestral nervous system organization of chelicerates.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Cambrian comb jellies from Utah illuminate the early evolution of nervous and sensory systems in ctenophores.iScience · 2021Article
- Proclivity of nervous system preservation in Cambrian Burgess Shale-type deposits.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Chengjiang fossil
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.