Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29643160›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Using machine learning techniques to develop forecasting algorithms for postoperative complications: protocol for a retrospective study.

Bradley A Fritz, Yixin Chen, Teresa M Murray-Torres, Stephen Gregory, Arbi Ben Abdallah, Alex Kronzer, Sherry Lynn McKinnon, Thaddeus Budelier, Daniel L Helsten, Troy S Wildes and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Bradley A FritzDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Yixin ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Teresa M Murray-TorresDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Stephen GregoryDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Arbi Ben AbdallahDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Alex KronzerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Sherry Lynn McKinnonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Thaddeus BudelierDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Daniel L HelstenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Troy S WildesDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Anshuman SharmaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Michael Simon AvidanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
TECTONICS (Telemedicine Control Tower for the OR: Navigating Information, Care and Safety) trialR01NR017916 · NINR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AVIDAN, MICHAEL SIMON · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
Anesthesiology Control Tower: Feedback Alerts to Supplement Treatment (ACTFAST)R21HS024581 · AHRQ · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AVIDAN, MICHAEL SIMON · 2017 to 2018
$300k
AHRQ HHS R21 HS024581NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NINR NIH HHS R01 NR017916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMortality and morbidity following surgery are pressing public health concerns in the USA. Traditional prediction models for postoperative adverse outcomes demonstrate good discrimination at the population level, but the ability to forecast an individual patient's trajectory in real time remains poor. We propose to apply machine learning techniques to perioperative time-series data to develop algorithms for predicting adverse perioperative outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will include all adult patients who had surgery at our tertiary care hospital over a 4-year period. Patient history, laboratory values, minute-by-minute intraoperative vital signs and medications administered will be extracted from the electronic medical record. Outcomes will include in-hospital mortality, postoperative acute kidney injury and postoperative respiratory failure. Forecasting algorithms for each of these outcomes will be constructed using density-based logistic regression after employing a Nadaraya-Watson kernel density estimator. Time-series variables will be analysed using first and second-order feature extraction, shapelet methods and convolutional neural networks. The algorithms will be validated through measurement of precision and recall. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Human Research Protection Office at Washington University in St Louis. The successful development of these forecasting algorithms will allow perioperative healthcare clinicians to predict more accurately an individual patient's risk for specific adverse perioperative outcomes in real time. Knowledge of a patient's dynamic risk profile may allow clinicians to make targeted changes in the care plan that will alter the patient's outcome trajectory. This hypothesis will be tested in a future randomised controlled trial.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningPostoperative ComplicationsAdultHumansMissouriRetrospective Studiesadult anaesthesiahealth informaticsinformation technology

Identifiers

PMID29643160
PMCPMC5898287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.