Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29643152›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Refugee maternal and perinatal health in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective population-based study.

Susitha Wanigaratne, Yogendra Shakya, Anita J Gagnon, Donald C Cole, Meb Rashid, Jennifer Blake, Parisa Dastoori, Rahim Moineddin, Joel G Ray, Marcelo L Urquia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Morbidity and mortality of newborns born to immigrant and nonimmigrant females residing in low-income neighbourhoods.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  9. Receipt of adequate prenatal care for privately sponsored versus government-assisted refugees in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Susitha WanigaratneCentre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0840-9006
Yogendra ShakyaAccess Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services, Toronto, Canada.
Anita J GagnonIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Donald C ColeDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Meb RashidCrossroads Medical Clinic, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer BlakeSociety of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Parisa DastooriCentre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rahim MoineddinDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joel G RayInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marcelo L UrquiaCentre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR MOP 137110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesImmigrants are thought to be healthier than their native-born counterparts, but less is known about the health of refugees or forced migrants. Previous studies often equate refugee status with immigration status or country of birth (COB) and none have compared refugee to non-refugee immigrants from the same COB. Herein, we examined whether: (1) a refugee mother experiences greater odds of adverse maternal and perinatal health outcomes compared with a similar non-refugee mother from the same COB and (2) refugee and non-refugee immigrants differ from Canadian-born mothers for maternal and perinatal outcomes.

designThis is a retrospective population-based database study. We implemented two cohort designs: (1) 1:1 matching of refugees to non-refugee immigrants on COB, year and age at arrival (±5 years) and (2) an unmatched design using all data. SETTING AND

participantsRefugee immigrant mothers (n=34 233), non-refugee immigrant mothers (n=243 439) and Canadian-born mothers (n=615 394) eligible for universal healthcare insurance who had a hospital birth in Ontario, Canada, between 2002 and 2014. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Numerous adverse maternal and perinatal health outcomes.

resultsRefugees differed from non-refugee immigrants most notably for HIV, with respective rates of 0.39% and 0.20% and an adjusted OR (AOR) of 1.82 (95% CI 1.19 to 2.79). Other elevated outcomes included caesarean section (AOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.08) and moderate preterm birth (AOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.17). For the majority of outcomes, refugee and non-refugee immigrants experienced similar AORs when compared with Canadian-born mothers.

conclusionsRefugee status was associated with a few adverse maternal and perinatal health outcomes, but the associations were not strong except for HIV. The definition of refugee status used herein may not sensitively identify refugees at highest risk. Future research would benefit from further refining refugee status based on migration experiences.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsMaternal HealthRefugeesCanadaCesarean SectionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornOntarioPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective Studiesepidemiologymaternal medicineperinatologypublic healthsocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID29643152
PMCPMC5898303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.