Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29643136›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2018

Orbital metastasis from an occult breast carcinoma (T0, N1, M1).

Rita Pinto Proença, Júlia Fernandes, Miguel N Burnier, Rui Proença

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rare sites of breast cancer metastasis: a review.Translational cancer research · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rita Pinto ProençaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central EPE, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1767-8080
Júlia FernandesCentro de Referência de Oftalmo-Oncologia, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal.
Miguel N BurnierOcular Pathology Laboratory, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Rui ProençaCentro de Referência de Oftalmo-Oncologia, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal.
Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra · PTMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The authors report a case of an orbital metastasis from an occult breast carcinoma. A 66-year-old woman presented with a growing left orbital tumour. Orbital CT scan was consistent with lymphoma. However, ocular pathology revealed small neoplastic cells showing an 'indian file pattern' suggestive of metastatic carcinoma and immunohistochemistry was positive for CK7, CK CAM5.2 and oestrogen receptor. A systemic evaluation was then performed with mammogram, breast ultrasound and MRI considered normal. An exhaustive systemic evaluation revealed multiple bone lesions, a right axillary lymph node lesion, which presented the same pattern on pathology and immunohistochemistry, with no evidence of a primary tumour. A diagnosis of a metastatic lobular carcinoma of the breast (T0, N1, M1) was made and the patient was started on chemotherapy and adjuvant hormonal therapy.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, LobularCombined Modality TherapyEye NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKeratin-7Magnetic Resonance ImagingMammographyNeoplasms, Unknown PrimaryTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyWhole Body ImagingBiomarkers, TumorKeratin-7breast cancercancer - see oncologypathology

Identifiers

PMID29643136
PMCPMC5898278
OpenAlexW2798036909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.