Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29643055›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018

Findings of the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-Sitting and Exacerbations Trial (COPD-SEAT) in Reducing Sedentary Time Using Wearable and Mobile Technologies With Educational Support: Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial.

Mark W Orme, Amie E Weedon, Paula M Saukko, Dale W Esliger, Mike D Morgan, Michael C Steiner, John W Downey, Lauren B Sherar, Sally J Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults: a mixed-method review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Content, uptake and adherence of exercise interventions after an acute exacerbation of COPD: a scoping review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mark W OrmeCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4678-6574
Amie E WeedonDepartment of Social Sciences, School of Social, Political and Geographical Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0489-7241
Paula M SaukkoDepartment of Social Sciences, School of Social, Political and Geographical Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7614-0091
Dale W EsligerNational Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1236-6419
Mike D MorganCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4474-4664
Michael C SteinerCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0127-0614
John W DowneyDepartment of Social Sciences, School of Social, Political and Geographical Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3823-9546
Lauren B Sherar *National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9942-5433
Sally J Singh *Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9834-0366

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTargeting sedentary time post exacerbation may be more relevant than targeting structured exercise for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Focusing interventions on sitting less and moving more after an exacerbation may act as a stepping stone to increase uptake to pulmonary rehabilitation.

objectiveThe aim of this paper was to conduct a randomized trial examining trial feasibility and the acceptability of an education and self-monitoring intervention using wearable technology to reduce sedentary behavior for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admitted to hospital for an acute exacerbation.

methodsParticipants were recruited and randomized in hospital into 3 groups, with the intervention lasting 2 weeks post discharge. The Education group received verbal and written information about reducing their time in sedentary behavior, sitting face-to-face with a study researcher. The Education+Feedback group received the same education component along with real-time feedback on their sitting time, stand-ups, and steps at home through a waist-worn inclinometer linked to an app. Patients were shown how to use the technology by the same study researcher. The inclinometer also provided vibration prompts to encourage movement at patient-defined intervals of time. Patients and health care professionals involved in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation care were interviewed to investigate trial feasibility and acceptability of trial design and methods. Main quantitative outcomes of trial feasibility were eligibility, uptake, and retention, and for acceptability, were behavioral responses to the vibration prompts.

resultsIn total, 111 patients were approached with 33 patients recruited (11 Control, 10 Education, and 12 Education+Feedback). Retention at 2-week follow-up was 52% (17/33; n=6 for Control, n=3 for Education, and n=8 for Education+Feedback). No study-related adverse events occurred. Collectively, patients responded to 106 out of 325 vibration prompts from the waist-worn inclinometer (32.62%). Within 5 min of the prompt, 41% of responses occurred, with patients standing for a mean 1.4 (SD 0.8) min and walking for 0.4 (SD 0.3) min (21, SD 11, steps). Interviews indicated that being unwell and overwhelmed after an exacerbation was the main reason for not engaging with the intervention. Health care staff considered reducing sedentary behavior potentially attractive for patients but suggested starting the intervention as an inpatient.

conclusionsAlthough the data support that it was feasible to conduct the trial, modifications are needed to improve participant retention. The intervention was acceptable to most patients and health care professionals.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 13790881; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13790881 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6xmnRGjFf).

Indexed as

chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasefeasibilityfitness trackersinterventionphysical activitysedentary lifestylesedentary timeself-monitoringwearable electronic devices

Identifiers

PMID29643055
PMCPMC5917078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.