Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29642964›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2018

Strengthening primary health care through primary care and public health collaboration: the influence of intrapersonal and interpersonal factors.

Ruta K Valaitis, Linda O'Mara, Sabrina T Wong, Marjorie MacDonald, Nancy Murray, Ruth Martin-Misener, Donna Meagher-Stewart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Clinical guideline for homeless and vulnerably housed people, and people with lived homelessness experience.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A Qualitative Study to Describe the Nature and Scope of Street Medicine Programs in the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ruta K Valaitis1Associate Professor and Dorothy C. Hall Chair in Primary Health Care Nursing,School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences,McMaster University,Hamilton ON,Canada.
Linda O'Mara2Associate Professor,School of Nursing,McMaster University,Hamilton,ON,Canada.
Sabrina T Wong3Professor,School of Nursing,University of British Columbia,Vancouver,BC,Canada.
Marjorie MacDonald4Professor,School of Nursing,University of Victoria,Victoria,BC,Canada.
Nancy Murray5Research Coordinator,School of Nursing,McMaster University,Hamilton,ON,Canada.
Ruth Martin-Misener6Professor,School of Nursing,Dalhousie University,Halifax,NS,Canada.
Donna Meagher-Stewart7Associate Professor,School of Nursing,Dalhousie University,Halifax,NS,Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AimThe aim of this paper is to examine Canadian key informants' perceptions of intrapersonal (within an individual) and interpersonal (among individuals) factors that influence successful primary care and public health collaboration.

backgroundPrimary health care systems can be strengthened by building stronger collaborations between primary care and public health. Although there is literature that explores interpersonal factors that can influence successful inter-organizational collaborations, a few of them have specifically explored primary care and public health collaboration. Furthermore, no papers were found that considered factors at the intrapersonal level. This paper aims to explore these gaps in a Canadian context.

methodsThis interpretative descriptive study involved key informants (service providers, managers, directors, and policy makers) who participated in one h telephone interviews to explore their perceptions of influences on successful primary care and public health collaboration. Transcripts were analyzed using NVivo 9.FindingsA total of 74 participants [from the provinces of British Columbia (n=20); Ontario (n=19); Nova Scotia (n=21), and representatives from other provinces or national organizations (n=14)] participated. Five interpersonal factors were found that influenced public health and primary care collaborations including: (1) trusting and inclusive relationships; (2) shared values, beliefs and attitudes; (3) role clarity; (4) effective communication; and (5) decision processes. There were two influencing factors found at the intrapersonal level: (1) personal qualities, skills and knowledge; and (2) personal values, beliefs, and attitudes. A few differences were found across the three core provinces involved. There were several complex interactions identified among all inter and intra personal influencing factors: One key factor - effective communication - interacted with all of them. Results support and extend our understanding of what influences successful primary care and public health collaboration at these levels and are important considerations in building and sustaining primary care and public health collaborations.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsIntersectoral CollaborationCanadaHumansPrimary Health CarePublic Healthcollaborationpartnershipprimary careprimary health carepublic healthrelational practice

Identifiers

PMID29642964
PMCPMC6452942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.