Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29642929›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2018

How well does the minimum data set measure healthcare use? a validation study.

Malcolm B Doupe, Jeff Poss, Peter G Norton, Allan Garland, Natalia Dik, Shauna Zinnick, Lisa M Lix

Abstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Malcolm B DoupeDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 408-727 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 3P5, Canada. Malcolm_doupe@cpe.umanitoba.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6889-9097
Jeff PossSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue W, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Peter G NortonUniversity of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Allan GarlandFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 820 Sherbrook St, Winnipeg, MB, R3A 1R9, Canada.
Natalia DikManitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, 408-727 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 3P5, Canada.
Shauna ZinnickGeorge & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, 4th floor, 753 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0T6, Canada.
Lisa M LixDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 408-727 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 3P5, Canada.

Funding

Research Manitoba n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo improve care, planners require accurate information about nursing home (NH) residents and their healthcare use. We evaluated how accurately measures of resident user status and healthcare use were captured in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) versus administrative data.

methodsThis retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on all NH residents (N = 8832) from Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, between April 1, 2011 and March 31, 2013. Six study measures exist. NH user status (newly admitted NH residents, those who transferred from one NH to another, and those who died) was measured using both MDS and administrative data. Rates of in-patient hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits without subsequent hospitalization, and physician examinations were also measured in each data source. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and overall agreement (kappa, κ) of each measure as captured by MDS using administrative data as the reference source. Also for each measure, logistic regression tested if the level of disagreement between data systems was associated with resident age and sex plus NH owner-operator status.

resultsMDS accurately identified newly admitted residents (κ = 0.97), those who transferred between NHs (κ = 0.90), and those who died (κ = 0.95). Measures of healthcare use were captured less accurately by MDS, with high levels of both under-reporting and false positives (e.g., for in-patient hospitalizations sensitivity = 0.58, PPV = 0.45), and moderate overall agreement levels (e.g., κ = 0.39 for ED visits). Disagreement was sometimes greater for younger males, and for residents living in for-profit NHs.

conclusionsMDS can be used as a stand-alone tool to accurately capture basic measures of NH use (admission, transfer, and death), and by proxy NH length of stay. As compared to administrative data, MDS does not accurately capture NH resident healthcare use. Research investigating these and other healthcare transitions by NH residents requires a combination of the MDS and administrative data systems.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDatasets as TopicEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleManitobaNursing HomesPatient Acceptance of Health CareRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTransition to Adult CareHealthcare useMDS recordsNursing homesValidation

Identifiers

PMID29642929
PMCPMC5896092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.