Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29642913›Full record

ReviewHealth and quality of life outcomes2018

A narrative synthesis of research evidence for tinnitus-related complaints as reported by patients and their significant others.

Deborah Ann Hall, Kathryn Fackrell, Anne Beatrice Li, Rachel Thavayogan, Sandra Smith, Veronica Kennedy, Catarina Tinoco, Evelina D Rodrigues, Paula Campelo, Tânia D Martins and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Tinnitus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sleep Quality in Patients with Tinnitus.Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Ginkgo Biloba and Caroverine in the Management of Idiopathic Tinnitus.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  15. Tinnitus in Children.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Review
  16. Prevalence of tinnitus and hyperacusis in 9-12-year-old children.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Deborah Ann HallOtology and hearing group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. deborah.hall@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3804-1452
Kathryn FackrellOtology and hearing group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Anne Beatrice LiSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Rachel ThavayoganSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Sandra SmithOtology and hearing group, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Veronica KennedyDepartment of Audiovestibular Medicine, Halliwell Health and Children's Centre, Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, Farnworth, UK.
Catarina TinocoENT Department, Hospital Cuf Infante Santo - Nova Medical School, Travessa do Castro, 3, 1350-070, Lisbon, Portugal.
Evelina D RodriguesWJCR - William James Center for Research, ISPA-Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco, n°34, 1149-041, Lisbon, Portugal.
Paula CampeloENT Department, Hospital Cuf Infante Santo - Nova Medical School, Travessa do Castro, 3, 1350-070, Lisbon, Portugal.
Tânia D MartinsENT Department, Hospital Cuf Infante Santo - Nova Medical School, Travessa do Castro, 3, 1350-070, Lisbon, Portugal.
Vera Martins LourençoENT Department, Hospital Cuf Infante Santo - Nova Medical School, Travessa do Castro, 3, 1350-070, Lisbon, Portugal.
Diogo RibeiroENT Department, Hospital Cuf Infante Santo - Nova Medical School, Travessa do Castro, 3, 1350-070, Lisbon, Portugal.
Haúla F HaiderENT Department, Hospital Cuf Infante Santo - Nova Medical School, Travessa do Castro, 3, 1350-070, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

European Cooperation in Science and Technology BM1306National Institute for Health Research NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are a large number of assessment tools for tinnitus, with little consensus on what it is important to measure and no preference for a minimum reporting standard. The item content of tinnitus assessment tools should seek to capture relevant impacts of tinnitus on everyday life, but no-one has yet synthesised information about the range of tinnitus complaints. This review is thus the first comprehensive and authoritative collection and synthesis of what adults with tinnitus and their significant others report as problems in their everyday lives caused by tinnitus.

methodsElectronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, as well as grey literature sources to identify publications from January 1980 to June 2015 in which participants were enrolled because tinnitus was their primary complaint. A manual search of seven relevant journals updated the search to December 2017. Of the 3699 titles identified overall, 84 records (reporting 86 studies) met our inclusion criteria and were taken through to data collection. Coders collated generic and tinnitus-specific complaints reported by people with tinnitus. All relevant data items were then analyzed using an iterative approach to narrative synthesis to form domain groupings representing complaints of tinnitus, which were compared patients and significant others.

resultsFrom the 86 studies analyzed using data collected from 16,381 patients, 42 discrete complaints were identified spanning physical and psychological health, quality of life and negative attributes of the tinnitus sound. This diversity was not captured by any individual study alone. There was good convergence between complaints collected using open- and closed-format questions, with the exception of general moods and perceptual attributes of tinnitus (location, loudness, pitch and unpleasantness); reported only using closed questions. Just two studies addressed data from the perspective of significant others (n = 79), but there was substantial correspondence with the patient framework, especially regarding relationships and social life.

conclusionsOur findings contribute fundamental new knowledge and a unique resource that enables investigators to appreciate the broad impacts of tinnitus on an individual. Our findings can also be used to guide questions during diagnostic assessment, to evaluate existing tinnitus-specific HR-QoL questionnaires and develop new ones, where necessary.

trial registrationPROSPERO registration number: CRD42015020629 . Protocol published in BMJ Open. 2016;6e009171.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAttitude to HealthAdultHumansMaleMental HealthNarrationQuality of LifeResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesTinnitusAdultsAudiologyOtologyPeople important outcomesSymptoms

Identifiers

PMID29642913
PMCPMC5896078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.