ArticleBMC public health2018
The public health emergency management system in China: trends from 2002 to 2012.
Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Appraisal of China's Response to the Outbreak of COVID-19 in Comparison With SARS.Frontiers in public health · 2021Pooled it
- Evaluating emergency management capabilities and identifying their related factors for public health emergencies in China.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Building a health system resilience framework: national, state, regional, and local perspectives.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Review
- Human-animal interfaces and zoonotic disease risks in China: a review of contact behaviors and risk communication.Science in One Health · 2026Review
- Research on the measurement of China's emergency management capabilities for public health emergencies and their driving factors.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Digital-based emergency prevention and control system: enhancing infection control in psychiatric hospitals.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Development of a core competence model for improving medical college students' ability in respond to public health emergencies.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Evaluating the efficiency of emergency operation centers during pandemics: a cross-sectional study with operational managers in Iran.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Psychological resilience factors in intensive care nursing: a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Influencing Factors and Symbiotic Mechanism of the Integration of Medical Care and Disease Prevention during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Public Hospital Employees.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- After action review of the response to an outbreak of Lassa fever in Sierra Leone, 2019: Best practices and lessons learnt.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- Construction of COVID-19 Epidemic Prevention and Control and Public Health Emergency Response System Based on Discrete Stochastic Mathematical Model.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Analysis of the Government and Capital Market's Response to Normalized Epidemic Prevention and Control Based on the Development of Smart Health Care.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Establishment of the emergency material reserve mechanism for public health emergencies and optimization of the management of various functional departments.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Nurses' core emergency competencies for COVID-19 in China: A cross-sectional study.International nursing review · 2021Article
- Comprehensive Risk Assessment of Schistosomiasis Epidemic Based on Precise Identification ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Physicians' Performance in China: A Cross-Level Mediation Model.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- A comparative study of international and Chinese public health emergency management from the perspective of knowledge domains mapping.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2020Article
- The public health response to the COVID-19 outbreak in mainland China: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
- Archetype analysis of older adult immunization decision-making and implementation in 34 countries.Vaccine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPublic health emergencies have challenged the public health emergency management systems (PHEMSs) of many countries critically and frequently since this century. As the world's most populated country and the second biggest economy in the world, China used to have a fragile PHEMS; however, the government took forceful actions to build PHEMS after the 2003 SARS outbreak. After more than one decade's efforts, we tried to assess the improvements and problems of China's PHEMS between 2002 and 2012.
methodsWe conducted two rounds of national surveys and collected the data of the year 2002 and 2012, including all 32 provincial, 139 municipal, and 489 county CDCs. The municipal and county CDCs were selected by systematic random sampling. Twenty-one indicators of four stages (preparation, readiness, response and recovery) from the National Assessment Criteria for CDC Performance were chosen to assess the ten-year trends.
resultsAt the preparation stage, organization, mechanisms, workforce, and stockpile across all levels and regions were significantly improved after one decade's efforts. At the readiness stage, the capability for formulating an emergency plan was also significantly improved during the same period. At the response stage, internet-based direct reporting was 98.8%, and coping scores were nearly full points of ten in 2012. At the recovery stage, the capabilities were generally lower than expected.
conclusionsDue to forceful leadership, sounder regulations, and intensive resources, China's PHEMS has been improved at the preparation, readiness, and response stages; however, the recovery stage was still weak and could not meet the requirements of crisis management and preventive governance. In addition, CDCs in the Western region and counties lagged behind in performance on most indicators. Future priorities should include developing the recovery stage, establishing a closed feedback loop, and strengthening the capabilities of CDCs in Western region and counties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.