Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29642875›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Comparing the performance of circulating cathodic antigen and Kato-Katz techniques in evaluating Schistosoma mansoni infection in areas with low prevalence in selected counties of Kenya: a cross-sectional study.

Collins Okoyo, Elses Simiyu, Sammy M Njenga, Charles Mwandawiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests for DetectingBioMed research international · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Reproducibility matters: intra- and inter-sample variation of the point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen test in twoPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A study on positive school children as indicators of schistosomiasis status in their families.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Collins OkoyoEastern and Southern Africa Centre of International Parasite Control, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), P.O. Box 54840 - 00200, Nairobi, Kenya. comondi@kemri.org.ORCID 0000-0002-2647-1359
Elses SimiyuEastern and Southern Africa Centre of International Parasite Control, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), P.O. Box 54840 - 00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sammy M NjengaEastern and Southern Africa Centre of International Parasite Control, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), P.O. Box 54840 - 00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Charles MwandawiroEastern and Southern Africa Centre of International Parasite Control, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), P.O. Box 54840 - 00200, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

Children's Investment Fund Foundation 208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKato-Katz technique has been the mainstay test in Schistosoma mansoni diagnosis in endemic areas. However, recent studies have documented its poor sensitivity in evaluating Schistosoma mansoni infection especially in areas with lower rates of transmission. It's the primary diagnostic tool in monitoring impact of the Kenya national school based deworming program on infection transmission, but there is need to consider a more sensitive technique as the prevalence reduces. Therefore, this study explored the relationship between results of the stool-based Kato-Katz technique with urine-based point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (POC-CCA) test in view to inform decision-making by the program in changing from Kato-Katz to POC-CCA test.

methodsWe used two cross-sectional surveys conducted pre- and post- mass drug administration (MDA) using praziquantel in a representative random sample of children from 18 schools across 11 counties. A total of 1944 children were randomly sampled for the study. Stool and urine samples were tested for S. mansoni infection using Kato-Katz and POC-CCA methods, respectively. S. mansoni prevalence using each technique was calculated and 95% confidence intervals obtained using binomial regression model. Specificity (Sp) and sensitivity (Sn) were determined using 2 × 2 contingency tables and compared using the McNemar's chi-square test.

resultsA total of 1899 and 1878 children were surveyed at pre- and post-treatment respectively. S. mansoni infection prevalence was 26.5 and 21.4% during pre- and post-treatment respectively using POC-CCA test, and 4.9 and 1.5% for pre- and post-treatment respectively using Kato-Katz technique. Taking POC-CCA as the gold standard, Kato-Katz was found to have significantly lower sensitivity both at pre- and post-treatment, Sn = 12.5% and Sn = 5.2% respectively, McNemar test χ

conclusionsResults showed POC-CCA technique as an effective, sensitive and accurate screening tool for Schistosoma mansoni infection in areas of low prevalence. It was up to 14-fold accurate than Kato-Katz which had extremely inadequate sensitivity. We recommend usage of POC-CCA alongside Kato-Katz examinations by Schistosomiasis control programs in low prevalence areas.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques and ProceduresPoint-of-Care SystemsAdolescentAnimalsAntigens, HelminthChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFecesFemaleHumansKenyaMaleMass Drug AdministrationModels, StatisticalPraziquantelAntigens, HelminthPraziquantelCirculating cathodic antigenKato-KatzSchistosoma mansoni

Identifiers

PMID29642875
PMCPMC5896080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.