Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29642861›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Identification of methylation sites and signature genes with prognostic value for luminal breast cancer.

Bin Xiao, Lidan Chen, Yongli Ke, Jianfeng Hang, Ling Cao, Rong Zhang, Weiyun Zhang, Yang Liao, Yang Gao, Jianyun Chen and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04282122 (Establishment of a Prospective Evaluation of Daily Practice Including the Individual Radiosensitivity Test to the Decision of Daily Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04282122 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Establishment of a Prospective Evaluation of Daily Practice Including the Individual Radiosensitivity Test to the Decision of Daily Practice

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRan2019 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsBreast CancerArmsRadiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Current status and challenges of breast cancer prevention~DNA methylation would lead to groundbreaking progress in breast cancer prevention~.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. PACSIN proteins in vivo: Roles in development and physiology.Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Bin XiaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command of PLA, Guangzhou, 510010, Guangdong, China.
Lidan ChenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command of PLA, Guangzhou, 510010, Guangdong, China.
Yongli KeDepartment of Breast Surgery, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command of PLA, Guangzhou, 510010, Guangdong, China.
Jianfeng HangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command of PLA, Guangzhou, 510010, Guangdong, China.
Ling CaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command of PLA, Guangzhou, 510010, Guangdong, China.
Rong ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command of PLA, Guangzhou, 510010, Guangdong, China.
Weiyun ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command of PLA, Guangzhou, 510010, Guangdong, China.
Yang LiaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command of PLA, Guangzhou, 510010, Guangdong, China.
Yang GaoInstitute of Antibody Engineering, School of Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianyun ChenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command of PLA, Guangzhou, 510010, Guangdong, China.
Li LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command of PLA, Guangzhou, 510010, Guangdong, China.
Wenbo HaoInstitute of Antibody Engineering, School of Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhaohui SunDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command of PLA, Guangzhou, 510010, Guangdong, China. zhaohui3@126.com.
Linhai LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command of PLA, Guangzhou, 510010, Guangdong, China. mature303@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5924-905X

Funding

The Natural Science Foundation of China 31672536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobust and precise molecular prognostic predictors for luminal breast cancer are required. This study aimed to identify key methylation sites in luminal breast cancer, as well as precise molecular tools for predicting prognosis.

methodsWe compared methylation levels of normal and luminal breast cancer samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset. The relationships among differentially methylated sites, corresponding mRNA expression levels and prognosis were further analysed. Differentially expressed genes in normal and cancerous samples were analysed, followed by the identification of prognostic signature genes. Samples were divided into low- and high-risk groups based on the signature genes. Prognoses of low- and high-risk groups were compared. The Gene Expression Omnibus dataset were used to validate signature genes for prognosis prediction. Prognosis of low- and high-risk groups in Luminal A and Luminal B samples from the TCGA and the Metabric cohort dataset were analyzed. We also analysed the correlation between clinical features of low- and high- risk groups as well as their differences in gene expression.

resultsFourteen methylation sites were considered to be related to luminal breast cancer prognosis because their methylation levels, mRNA expression and prognoses were closely related to each other. The methylation level of SOSTDC1 was used to divide samples into hypo- and hyper-methylation groups. We also identified an mRNA signature, comprising eight transcripts, ESCO2, PACSIN1, CDCA2, PIGR, PTN, RGMA, KLK4 and CENPA, which was used to divide samples into low- and high-risk groups. The low-risk group showed significantly better prognosis than the high-risk group. A correlation analysis revealed that the risk score was an independent prognostic factor. Low- and high- risk groups significantly correlated with the survival ratio in Luminal A samples, but not in Luminal B samples on the basis of the TCGA and the Metabric cohort dataset. Further functional annotation demonstrated that the differentially expressed genes were mainly involved in cell cycle and cancer progression.

conclusionsWe identified several key methylation sites and an mRNA signature for predicting luminal breast cancer prognosis. The signature exhibited effective and precise prediction of prognosis and may serve as a prognostic and diagnostic marker for luminal breast cancer.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProteinsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProteinsSOSTDC1 protein, humanLuminal breast cancerMethylationmRNAPrognosisSOSTDC1

Identifiers

PMID29642861
PMCPMC5896050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.