Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29642840›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

iSeg: an efficient algorithm for segmentation of genomic and epigenomic data.

Senthil B Girimurugan, Yuhang Liu, Pei-Yau Lung, Daniel L Vera, Jonathan H Dennis, Hank W Bass, Jinfeng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Senthil B GirimuruganDepartment of Mathematics, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, USA.
Yuhang LiuDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Pei-Yau LungDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Daniel L VeraCenter for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Jonathan H DennisDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Hank W BassDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Jinfeng ZhangDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA. jinfeng@stat.fsu.edu.

Funding

Collaborative Research: Mathematical Framework for Biomolecules: From Protein to RNA to ChromosomesR01GM126558 · NIGMS · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, JINFENG · 2017 to 2021
$1.5M
National Science Foundation IOS Award 1444532NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126558NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM126558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of functional elements of a genome often requires dividing a sequence of measurements along a genome into segments where adjacent segments have different properties, such as different mean values. Despite dozens of algorithms developed to address this problem in genomics research, methods with improved accuracy and speed are still needed to effectively tackle both existing and emerging genomic and epigenomic segmentation problems.

resultsWe designed an efficient algorithm, called iSeg, for segmentation of genomic and epigenomic profiles. iSeg first utilizes dynamic programming to identify candidate segments and test for significance. It then uses a novel data structure based on two coupled balanced binary trees to detect overlapping significant segments and update them simultaneously during searching and refinement stages. Refinement and merging of significant segments are performed at the end to generate the final set of segments. By using an objective function based on the p-values of the segments, the algorithm can serve as a general computational framework to be combined with different assumptions on the distributions of the data. As a general segmentation method, it can segment different types of genomic and epigenomic data, such as DNA copy number variation, nucleosome occupancy, nuclease sensitivity, and differential nuclease sensitivity data. Using simple t-tests to compute p-values across multiple datasets of different types, we evaluate iSeg using both simulated and experimental datasets and show that it performs satisfactorily when compared with some other popular methods, which often employ more sophisticated statistical models. Implemented in C++, iSeg is also very computationally efficient, well suited for large numbers of input profiles and data with very long sequences.

conclusionsWe have developed an efficient general-purpose segmentation tool and showed that it had comparable or more accurate results than many of the most popular segment-calling algorithms used in contemporary genomic data analysis. iSeg is capable of analyzing datasets that have both positive and negative values. Tunable parameters allow users to readily adjust the statistical stringency to best match the biological nature of individual datasets, including widely or sparsely mapped genomic datasets or those with non-normal distributions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, GeneticEpigenomicsComputer SimulationDeoxyribonucleasesDNA Copy Number VariationsGenomeHumansModels, StatisticalNeoplasmsZea maysDeoxyribonucleases

Identifiers

PMID29642840
PMCPMC5896135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.