Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29642683›Full record

ArticleAsian-Australasian journal of animal sciences2018

Effect of Lactobacillus salivarius on growth performance, diarrhea incidence, fecal bacterial population and intestinal morphology of suckling pigs challenged with F4+ enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.

Harutai Sayan, Pornchalit Assavacheep, Kris Angkanaporn, Anongnart Assavacheep

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Role of ProbioticsInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Dietary supplementation ofJournal of animal science and technology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Enhancing the antibacterial ability ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  8. Functional evaluation ofTranslational animal science · 2024
    Article
  9. Detection of EnterotoxigenicLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects of Heat-KilledVeterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Effects of supplementation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Effects of Multi-Strain Probiotics andAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A meta-analysis ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harutai SayanDepartment of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Pornchalit AssavacheepDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Kris AngkanapornDepartment of Veterinary Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Anongnart AssavacheepDepartment of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Chulalongkorn University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGut health improvements were monitored with respect to growth performance, diarrhea incidence, fecal bacterial population and intestinal morphology of suckling pigs orally supplemented with live Lactobacillus salivarius (L. salivarius) oral suspensions and challenged with F4+ enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC).

methodsTwo groups of newborn pigs from 18 multiparous sows were randomly designated as non-supplemented (control: n = 114 piglets) and L. salivarius supplemented groups (treatment: n = 87 piglets). Treatment pigs were orally administered with 2 mL of 109 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL L. salivarius on days 1 to 3, then they were orally administered with 5 mL of 109 CFU/mL L. salivarius on days 4 to 10, while those in control group received an equal amount of phosphate buffered saline solution. On day 24 (2 weeks post supplementation), one pig per replicate of both groups was orally administered with 108 CFU/mL F4+ ETEC, then they were euthanized on day 29 of experiment.

resultsResults revealed that pigs in treatment group had a statistically significant increase in average daily gain, body weight and weight gain, and tended to lower diarrhea throughout the study. Numbers of Lactobacillus population in feces of treatment pigs were higher than control pigs, especially on day 10 of study. Numbers of total bacteria in intestinal contents of control pigs were also increased, but not Coliform and Lactobacillus populations. Histological examination revealed statistically significant improvements of villous height and villous/crypt ratio of duodenum, proximal jejunum and distal jejunum parts of treatment pigs compared with controls. Duodenal pH of treatment group was significantly decreased.

conclusionOral supplementation of live L. salivarius during the first 10 days of suckling pig promoted growth performance and gut health, reduced diarrhea incidence, increased fecal Lactobacillus populations and improved intestinal morphology.

Indexed as

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4Fecal Bacterial PopulationGrowth PerformanceIntestinal MorphologyLactobacillus salivariusSuckling Pigs

Identifiers

PMID29642683
PMCPMC6043459
OpenAlexW2800960967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.