Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29642610›Full record

ArticleInsects2018

Don't Know Much about Bumblebees?-A Study about Secondary School Students' Knowledge and Attitude Shows Educational Demand.

Anne-Kathrin Sieg, Rudolf Teibtner, Daniel Dreesmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne-Kathrin SiegDepartment of Biology Education, Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Johannes Gutenberg University, D-55099 Mainz, Germany. anne.sieg@uni-mainz.de.
Rudolf TeibtnerDepartment of Biology Education, Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Johannes Gutenberg University, D-55099 Mainz, Germany. rteibtne@students.uni-mainz.de.
Daniel DreesmannDepartment of Biology Education, Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Johannes Gutenberg University, D-55099 Mainz, Germany. daniel.dreesmann@uni-mainz.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9150-3871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many insects are threatened with extinction, which in the case of pollinating insects could lead to declining pollination services and reduced ecosystem biodiversity. This necessitates rethinking how we deal with nature in general. Schools are ideal places in which to instill a willingness to behave in an environmentally-friendly way. Whereas scientific studies and school textbooks stress the importance of honeybees as pollinators, the role of bumblebees is either underestimated or neglected. The aim of this study was to provide information concerning student knowledge and attitudes, which are important factors of an individual's environmental awareness. A questionnaire with closed and open questions was developed, which also included drawing and species identification tasks. We surveyed 870 German secondary school students between 9 and 20 years of age. Our results indicate limited knowledge of bumblebees by students of all grades. Knowledge increased with higher grades but only with a small effect size. The attitude of students towards bumblebees was generally positive; however, this positivity declined with increasing grade of the participants. This correlation also had a small effect size. Our results are discussed, with a particular focus on future educational demand.

Indexed as

attitudebiodiversitybiology educationBombusBumblebeesconservationenvironmental awarenessinsectsknowledgepollinators

Identifiers

PMID29642610
PMCPMC6023494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.