Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29642451›Full record

ReviewNutrients2018

Should We Prescribe More Protein to Critically Ill Patients?

Daren K Heyland, Renee Stapleton, Charlene Compher

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. High-protein home parenteral nutrition in malnourished oncology patients: a systematic literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Nutrients · 2026
    Article
  4. Physiological barriers to oral intake in survivors of critical illness: A scoping review.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Mounting Clarity on Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Patients.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Preserving the quality of life: nutrition in the ICU.Critical care (London, England) · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daren K HeylandDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON K7L 2V7, Canada. dkh2@queensu.ca.
Renee StapletonPulmonary and Critical Care Division, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT 05405, USA. Renee.Stapleton@uvm.edu.
Charlene CompherBiobehavioral Research Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. compherc@nursing.upenn.edu.
Queen's University · CAUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of critical illness, evidence suggests that exogenous protein/amino acid supplementation has the potential to favorably impact whole-body protein balance. Whether this translates into retention of muscle, greater muscle strength, and improved survival and physical recovery of critically ill patients remains uncertain. The purpose of this brief commentary is to provide an overview of the clinical evidence for and against increasing protein doses and to introduce two new trials that will add considerably to our evolving understanding of protein requirements in the critically ill adult patient.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusChi-Square DistributionCritical IllnessDietary ProteinsHumansMuscle StrengthNutritional SupportOdds RatioPatient SafetyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecommended Dietary AllowancesRecovery of FunctionRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeDietary Proteinscritical care nutritioncritically illEFFORT trialhigh proteinNEXIS trialprotein supplementation

Identifiers

PMID29642451
PMCPMC5946247
OpenAlexW2795644508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.