Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29642450›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2018

Mechanistic Insights into the Stimulant Properties of Novel Psychoactive Substances (NPS) and Their Discrimination by the Dopamine Transporter-In Silico and In Vitro Exploration of Dissociative Diarylethylamines.

Michelle A Sahai, Colin Davidson, Neelakshi Dutta, Jolanta Opacka-Juffry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Synthesis and crystal structures of five fluorinated diphenidine derivatives.Acta crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle A SahaiDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, London SW15 4JD, UK. Michelle.Sahai@ROEHAMPTON.AC.UK.
Colin DavidsonSt George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK. CDavidson2@uclan.ac.uk.
Neelakshi DuttaSt George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK. p0402670@sgul.ac.uk.
Jolanta Opacka-JuffryDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, London SW15 4JD, UK. j.opacka-juffry@roehampton.ac.uk.
St George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Roehampton · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L01386X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel psychoactive substances (NPS) may have unsuspected addiction potential through possessing stimulant properties. Stimulants normally act at the dopamine transporter (DAT) and thus increase dopamine (DA) availability in the brain, including nucleus accumbens, within the reward and addiction pathway. This paper aims to assess DAT responses to dissociative diarylethylamine NPS by means of in vitro and in silico approaches. We compared diphenidine (DPH) and 2-methoxydiphenidine (methoxphenidine, 2-MXP/MXP) for their binding to rat DAT, using autoradiography assessment of [

Indexed as

addictionautoradiographybrainDATdiphenidinedopaminefree energy calculationmolecular dynamicsvoltammetry

Identifiers

PMID29642450
PMCPMC5924399
OpenAlexW2795979508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.