Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29642425›Full record

ArticleNutrients2018

Lutein and Zeaxanthin Are Positively Associated with Visual-Spatial Functioning in Older Adults: An fMRI Study.

Catherine M Mewborn, Cutter A Lindbergh, Talia L Robinson, Marissa A Gogniat, Douglas P Terry, Kharine R Jean, Billy Randy Hammond, Lisa M Renzi-Hammond, Lloyd Stephen Miller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine M MewbornDepartment of Psychology, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. cmewborn@uga.edu.
Cutter A LindberghDepartment of Psychology, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. cal@uga.edu.
Talia L RobinsonDepartment of Psychology, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. talia.robinson25@uga.edu.
Marissa A GogniatDepartment of Psychology, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. marissa.gogniat25@uga.edu.
Douglas P TerryDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA. douglasterry1@gmail.com.
Kharine R JeanDepartment of Psychology, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. kjean@uga.edu.
Billy Randy HammondDepartment of Psychology, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. bhammond@uga.edu.
Lisa M Renzi-HammondDepartment of Psychology, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. lrenzi@uga.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4334-8202
Lloyd Stephen MillerDepartment of Psychology, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. lsmiller@uga.edu.
University of Georgia · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lutein (L) and zeaxanthin (Z) are two xanthophyll carotenoids that have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Previous work has demonstrated their importance for eye health and preventing diseases such as age-related macular degeneration. An emerging literature base has also demonstrated the importance of L and Z in cognition, neural structure, and neural efficiency. The present study aimed to better understand the mechanisms by which L and Z relate to cognition, in particular, visual-spatial processing and decision-making in older adults. We hypothesized that markers of higher levels of L and Z would be associated with better neural efficiency during a visual-spatial processing task. L and Z were assessed via standard measurement of blood serum and retinal concentrations. Visual-spatial processing and decision-making were assessed via a judgment of line orientation task (JLO) completed during a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan. The results demonstrated that individuals with higher concentrations of L and Z showed a decreased blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal during task performance (i.e., "neural efficiency") in key areas associated with visual-spatial perception, processing, decision-making, and motor coordination, including the lateral occipital cortex, occipital pole, superior and middle temporal gyri, superior parietal lobule, superior and middle frontal gyri, and pre- and post-central gyri. To our knowledge, this is the first investigation of the relationship of L and Z to visual-spatial processing at a neural level using in vivo methodology. Our findings suggest that L and Z may impact brain health and cognition in older adults by enhancing neurobiological efficiency in a variety of regions that support visual perception and decision-making.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorCognitionMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpatial ProcessingVisual PerceptionAgedAge FactorsAgingBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansJudgmentLuteinMaleZeaxanthinsLuteinZeaxanthinscognitionfMRIolder adultsvisual-spatial reasoningxanthophylls

Identifiers

PMID29642425
PMCPMC5946243
OpenAlexW2795561488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.