SynthesisMedicine2018
Associations between serum vitamin D and the risk of female reproductive tumors: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vitamin D and Multiple Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Observational Studies, Randomized Controlled Trials, and Mendelian Randomization Studies.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Pooled it
- Correlation of low serum vitamin-D with uterine leiomyoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2020Pooled it
- Vitamins in Gynecologic Malignancies.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Serum Level of Vitamin D in Patients with Salivary Gland Tumors.Iranian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2023Article
- Vitamin D, Menopausal Health and COVID-19: Critical Appraisal of Current Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Vitamin D in gynecological diseases.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2021Article
- Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of cancer: The D2d cancer outcomes (D2dCA) study.Contemporary clinical trials · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFemale reproductive tumors are common with high morbidity and mortality worldwide; however, the association between gynecological tumors and serum vitamin D is controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the relationship between insufficiency of serum vitamin D and the occurrence of benign and malignant gynecological tumors.
methodsStudies from inception to June 2017 were searched in the electronic databases: National Library of Medicine (PubMed), Web of Science (Clerivate), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Cochrane Library, CDSR) by 2 investigators independently. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. STATA 12.0 Software and Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) software were applied for data analyses.
resultsOverall, 8 studies (including 2391 patients and 5798 patients with and without female reproductive tumors, respectively) were eligible for the present meta-analysis. In the subsequent meta-analysis, the occurrence of vitamin D deficiency in the case and control groups were 52.36% and 48.70%, respectively; women with female reproductive benign and malignant tumors were 55.57% and 50.59%, respectively. Although, no conclusive association was found between vitamin D deficiency and female reproductive tumors (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.85-1.31); vitamin D deficiency may be a risk factor of malignant female reproductive neoplasm, as shown by the pooled OR (95% CI):1.17 (1.02-1.33). Furthermore, based on the OR values, association of vitamin D insufficiency with disease type, study location, number of patients, and methods for detecting CLA was observed. Similar results in the sensitivity analysis were observed. TSA showed that the cumulative Z-curve crossed the traditional boundary line, rather than crossing the trial sequential monitoring boundary. However, the cumulative information failed to reach the required information size.
conclusionsCurrently, vitamin D deficiency appears to be a common issue in females, and there may be an urgent need to improve the level of vitamin D. Furthermore, vitamin D deficiency may be a non-negligible risk factor of malignant female reproductive neoplasm. Undoubtedly, more trials are required in the future according to TSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.