ArticlePloS one2018
The Trier Social Stress Test and the Trier Social Stress Test for groups: Qualitative investigations.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of a group-based compassion microintervention compared to cognitive reappraisal training on cardiovascular, self-reported, and behavioral stress reactivity among young adults: A cluster randomized controlled trial.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2025Trial
- Article
- Salivary Biomarkers as a Predictive Factor in Anxiety, Depression, and Stress.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Endogenous glucocorticoids and human immunity: Time to revisit old dogmas.Seminars in immunology · 2025Review
- Applying qualitative methods to experimental designs: A tutorial for the behavioral sciences.PloS one · 2025Article
- Classification of emotional stress and physical stress using a multispectral based deep feature extraction model.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Effects of Sleep Reactivity on Sleep Macro-Structure, Orderliness, and Cortisol After Stress: A Preliminary Study in Healthy Young Adults.Nature and science of sleep · 2023Article
- Empathy Modulates the Effect of Stress Reactivity on Generous Giving.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Stress research during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
- Social evaluation under stress: Does acute stress affect social attributions and eye gaze?Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2021Article
- Influence of stress on physiological synchrony in a stressful versus non-stressful group setting.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021Article
- Knowledge Mobilized in Teacher-Student Interactions in PE in Difficult Vocational High School Classes: Enacted Knowledge.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Can situations awaken emotions? The compilation and evaluation of the Emotional Situation Sentence System (ESSS).PloS one · 2021Article
- Real-Time Assessment of Stress and Stress Response Using Digital Phenotyping: A Study Protocol.Frontiers in digital health · 2020Article
- The MAOA Gene Influences the Neural Response to Psychosocial Stress in the Human Brain.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2020Article
- Acute emotional stress as a trigger for intraocular pressure elevation in Glaucoma.BMC ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Sex-specific contribution of DHEA-cortisol ratio to prefrontal-hippocampal structural development, cognitive abilities and personality traits.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) and its version for groups (TSST-G) are the gold standard for inducing acute psychosocial stress in human experimental settings and have been used in numerous studies since the early 1990s. The TSST and the TSST-G lead to effects on different physiological and psychological markers, such as salivary cortisol, anxiety, and emotional states. These effects were assessed with quantitative methods comparing pre-test and post-test measures with statistical analyses. But to date, no qualitative analyses have been conducted to examine the meaningful experience of participants during the TSST and the TSST-G. This study is the first to conduct qualitative investigations to further clarify the stressful experience of participants confronted with these procedures. Preliminary results showed as expected that the TSST and the TSST-G effectively induced psychosocial stress, with cortisol levels, cognitive anxiety, somatic anxiety, and arousal increases, and with pleasure and dominance decreases. At the qualitative level, the results evidenced that the two theoretically stressful components of the TSST and the TSST-G, namely social-evaluative threat and uncontrollability, were experienced as stress-inducing by the participants. Two case studies confirmed these findings. But the results also showed on one hand that psychosocial stress is a dynamic phenomenon, with important fluctuations throughout the tasks (mainly for the TSST-G); and on the other hand that despite the similar physiological and psychological responses between the TSST and the TSST-G evidenced by the literature, the experience of the participants was both similar and specific. Use of a qualitative method allowed us to provide a complementary point of view to understand the meaningful experience of participants during these stressful procedures, apprehending the dynamic of the subjective stress experience without disrupting it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.