Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29641544›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

A paucity of strategies for developing health literate organisations: A systematic review.

Jane E Lloyd, Hyun J Song, Sarah M Dennis, Nicola Dunbar, Elizabeth Harris, Mark F Harris

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Co-Creating Organisational Health Literacy: Formative Evaluation and Feasibility Testing of OHL-Act.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Shifts in Diabetes Health Literacy Policy and Practice in Australia-Promoting Organisational Health Literacy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jane E LloydHealth Equity Research and Development Unit, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1364-2072
Hyun J SongCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sarah M DennisCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Nicola DunbarAustralian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Elizabeth HarrisHealth Equity Research and Development Unit, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mark F HarrisCentre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople with low health literacy are more likely to delay seeking care and experience adverse outcomes. While health literacy is the product of individuals' capacities, it is also affected by the complexities of the health care system. System-level changes are needed to align health care demands better with the public's skills and abilities. We aimed to identify the evidence base for effective strategies for creating health literate organisations.

methodsA systematic review and narrative synthesis of empirical studies was performed. Medline, Embase, PsychInfo and CINHAL databases were searched for empirical studies from OECD countries published from 2008 onwards, focusing on health literacy interventions at the organisational level. Analysis of the findings was informed by the National Academies' five-dimensional framework for the attributes of a health literate organisation, which include: organisational commitment, accessible education and technology infrastructure, augmented workforce, embedded policies and practices, and effective bidirectional communication.

resultsThe title and abstract of 867 records were screened according to the selection criteria, leading to full text review of 125 articles. Seven studies were identified in the peer review literature. Adapting health literacy guidelines and tools was the most common approach to addressing organisational health literacy.

conclusionWhile the use of health literacy tools proved important for raising awareness of health literacy issues within organisations, these tools were insufficient for generating the organisational changes necessary to improve organisational health literacy.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyAccess to InformationAttitude to HealthAustraliaAwarenessCommunicationDelivery of Health CareHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansModels, OrganizationalTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID29641544
PMCPMC5895007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.