Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29641543›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis multilocus sequence types and genovar distribution in chlamydia infected patients in a multi-ethnic region of Saratov, Russia.

Valentina A Feodorova, Svetlana S Konnova, Yury V Saltykov, Sergey S Zaitsev, Irina A Subbotina, Tatiana I Polyanina, Sergey S Ulyanov, Susanna L Lamers, Charlotte A Gaydos, Thomas C Quinn and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Emergence of NovelMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Valentina A FeodorovaLaboratory for Molecular Biology of Chlamydia, Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology (FRCViM), Pokrov, Vladimir region, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3827-407X
Svetlana S KonnovaLaboratory for Molecular Biology of Chlamydia, Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology (FRCViM), Pokrov, Vladimir region, Russia.
Yury V SaltykovLaboratory for Molecular Biology of Chlamydia, Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology (FRCViM), Pokrov, Vladimir region, Russia.
Sergey S ZaitsevLaboratory for Molecular Biology of Chlamydia, Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology (FRCViM), Pokrov, Vladimir region, Russia.
Irina A SubbotinaLaboratory for Molecular Biology of Chlamydia, Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology (FRCViM), Pokrov, Vladimir region, Russia.
Tatiana I PolyaninaLaboratory for Molecular Biology of Chlamydia, Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology (FRCViM), Pokrov, Vladimir region, Russia.
Sergey S UlyanovLaboratory for Molecular Biology of Chlamydia, Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology (FRCViM), Pokrov, Vladimir region, Russia.
Susanna L LamersBioinfoexperts LLC, Thibodaux, Los Angeles, United States of America.
Charlotte A GaydosDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (JHUScM), Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Thomas C QuinnDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (JHUScM), Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Vladimir L MotinDepartment of Pathology, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston, Texas, United States of America.
State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology VECTOR · RUJohns Hopkins University · USNational Research Institute for Veterinary Virology and Microbiology of Russia · RUSaratov State University · RUThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

TrainingU54EB007958 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Yukari C Manabe, Susan Anne Tuddenham · 2007 to 2026
$34.6M
International Studies of the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)ZIAAI000361 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI REDD, ANDREW · 2009 to 2025
$15.8M
Immunopathogenesis Of Chlamydia trachomatis InfectionZIAAI000358 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI QUINN, THOMAS · 2009 to 2022
$7.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB007958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis is the first report to characterize the prevalence and genovar distribution of genital chlamydial infections among random heterosexual patients in the multi-ethnic Saratov Region, located in Southeast Russia.

methodsSixty-one clinical samples (cervical or urethral swabs) collected from a random cohort of 856 patients (7.1%) were C. trachomatis (CT) positive in commercial nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and duplex TaqMan PCRs.

resultsSequence analysis of the VDII region of the ompA gene revealed seven genovars of C. trachomatis in PCR-positive patients. The overall genovars were distributed as E (41.9%), G (21.6%), F (13.5%), K (9.5%), D (6.8%), J (4.1%), and H (2.7%). CT-positive samples were from males (n = 12, 19.7%), females (n = 42, 68.8%), and anonymous (n = 7, 11.5%) patients, with an age range of 19 to 45 years (average 26.4), including 12 different ethnic groups representative of this region. Most patients were infected with a single genovar (82%), while 18% were co-infected with either two or three genovars. The 1156 bp-fragment of the ompA gene was sequenced in 46 samples to determine single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) among isolates. SNP-based subtyping and phylogenetic reconstruction revealed the presence of 13 variants of the ompA gene, such as E (E1, E2, E6), G (G1, G2, G3, G5), F1, K, D (D1, Da2), J1, and H2. Differing genovar distribution was identified among urban (E>G>F) and rural (E>K) populations, and in Slavic (E>G>D) and non-Slavic (E>G>K) ethnic groups. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) determined five sequences types (STs), such as ST4 (56%, 95% confidence interval, CI, 70.0 to 41.3), ST6 (10%, 95% CI 21.8 to 3.3), ST9 (22%, 95% CI 35.9 to 11.5), ST10 (2%, 95% CI 10.7 to 0.05) and ST38 (10%, 95% CI 21.8 to 3.3). Thus, the most common STs were ST4 and ST9.

conclusionC. trachomatis is a significant cause of morbidity among random heterosexual patients with genital chlamydial infections in the Saratov Region. Further studies should extend this investigation by describing trends in a larger population, both inside and outside of the Saratov Region to clarify some aspects for the actual application of C. trachomatis genotype analysis for disease control.

Indexed as

EthnicityMultilocus Sequence TypingAdolescentAdultBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRussiaUrogenital SystemYoung AdultBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsOMPA outer membrane proteins

Identifiers

PMID29641543
PMCPMC5895025
OpenAlexW2796501040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.