Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29641538›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Prognostic impact of systolic blood pressure variability in people with diabetes.

Katy J L Bell, Lamiae Azizi, Peter M Nilsson, Andrew Hayen, Les Irwig, Carl J Östgren, Johan Sundröm

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katy J L BellSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0137-3218
Lamiae AziziSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Peter M NilssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmo, University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden.
Andrew HayenAustralian Centre for Public and Population Health Research University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Les IrwigSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Carl J ÖstgrenDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Linkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden.
Johan SundrömDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBlood pressure variability (BPV) has been associated with risk of cardiovascular events in observational studies, independently of mean BP levels. In states with higher autonomic imbalance, such as in diabetes, the importance of BP variability may theoretically be even greater. We aimed to investigate the incremental value of BPV for prediction of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.

methodsWe identified 9,855 patients without pre-existing cardiovascular disease who did not change BP-lowering treatment during the observation period from a Swedish primary health care cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes. BPV was summarized as the standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), or variation independent of mean (VIM). Patients were followed for a median of 4 years and associations with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality were investigated using Cox proportional hazards models.

resultsBPV was not associated with cardiovascular specific or all-cause mortality in the total sample. In patients who were not on BP-lowering drugs during the observation period (n = 2,949), variability measures were associated with all-cause mortality: hazard ratios were 1.05, 1.04 and 1.05 for 50% increases in SD, CV and VIM, respectively, adjusted for Framingham risk score risk factors, including mean BP. However, the addition of the variability measures in this subgroup only led to very minimal improvement in discrimination, indicating they may have limited clinical usefulness (change in C-statistic ranged from 0.000-0.003 in all models).

conclusionsAlthough BPV was independently associated with all-cause mortality in diabetes patients in primary care who did not have pre-existing cardiovascular disease or BP-lowering drugs, it may be of minimal clinical usefulness above and beyond that of other routinely measured predictors, including mean BP.

Indexed as

AgedBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID29641538
PMCPMC5894975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.