Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29641514›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2018

Age is not just a number: Naive T cells increase their ability to persist in the circulation over time.

Sanket Rane, Thea Hogan, Benedict Seddon, Andrew J Yates

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. SURROGATE SELECTION OVERSAMPLES EXPANDED T CELL CLONOTYPES.The annals of applied statistics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The dynamics and longevity of circulating CD4bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Modeling T Cell Fate.Annual review of immunology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Transcriptional Analysis of Total CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Naïve T Cell Quiescence in Immune Aging.Advances in geriatric medicine and research · 2021
    Article
  19. Altered CaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sanket RaneDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Thea HoganInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, Division of Infection and Immunity, UCL, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Benedict SeddonInstitute of Immunity and Transplantation, Division of Infection and Immunity, UCL, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew J YatesDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4606-4483
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

Modeling the development, structure and regulation of T cell memoryR01AI093870 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW · PI YATES, ANDREW · 2011 to 2025
$5.9M
Arthritis Research UKMedical Research Council MC-PC-13055NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The processes regulating peripheral naive T-cell numbers and clonal diversity remain poorly understood. Conceptually, homeostatic mechanisms must fall into the broad categories of neutral (simple random birth-death models), competition (regulation of cell numbers through quorum-sensing, perhaps via limiting shared resources), adaptation (involving cell-intrinsic changes in homeostatic fitness, defined as net growth rate over time), or selection (involving the loss or outgrowth of cell populations deriving from intercellular variation in fitness). There may also be stably maintained heterogeneity within the naive T-cell pool. To distinguish between these mechanisms, we confront very general models of these processes with an array of experimental data, both new and published. While reduced competition for homeostatic stimuli may impact cell survival or proliferation in neonates or under moderate to severe lymphopenia, we show that the only mechanism capable of explaining multiple, independent experimental studies of naive CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell homeostasis in mice from young adulthood into old age is one of adaptation, in which cells act independently and accrue a survival or proliferative advantage continuously with their post-thymic age. However, aged naive T cells may also be functionally impaired, and so the accumulation of older cells via 'conditioning through experience' may contribute to reduced immune responsiveness in the elderly.

Indexed as

Models, ImmunologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalAgedAgingAnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell CommunicationCell ProliferationCell SurvivalGenetic FitnessHomeostasisHumansImmunologic MemoryLymphocyte ActivationLymphocyte Count

Identifiers

PMID29641514
PMCPMC5894957
OpenAlexW2797849215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.